Instead of waiting for AI models to be perfect, design your application from the start to allow for human correction. This pragmatic approach acknowledges AI's inherent uncertainty and allows you to deliver value sooner by leveraging human oversight to handle edge cases.

To avoid over-engineering, validate an AI chatbot using a simple spreadsheet as its knowledge base. This MVP approach quickly tests user adoption and commercial value. The subsequent pain of manually updating the sheet is the best justification for investing engineering resources into a proper data pipeline.

In AI, low prototyping costs and customer uncertainty make the traditional research-first PM model obsolete. The new approach is to build a prototype quickly, show it to customers to discover possibilities, and then iterate based on their reactions, effectively building the solution before the problem is fully defined.

Historically, resource-intensive prototyping (requiring designers and tools like Figma) was reserved for major features. AI tools reduce prototype creation time to minutes, allowing PMs to de-risk even minor features with user testing and solution discovery, improving the entire product's success rate.

For frontier technologies like BCIs, a Minimum Viable Product can be self-defeating because a "mid" signal from a hacky prototype is uninformative. Neuralink invests significant polish into experiments, ensuring that if an idea fails, it's because the concept is wrong, not because the execution was poor.

Instead of providing a vague functional description, feed prototyping AIs a detailed JSON data model first. This separates data from UI generation, forcing the AI to build a more realistic and higher-quality experience around concrete data, avoiding ambiguity and poor assumptions.

You don't need to create an automated "LLM as a judge" for every potential failure. Many issues discovered during error analysis can be fixed with a simple prompt adjustment. Reserve the effort of building robust, automated evals for the 4-7 most persistent and critical failure modes that prompt changes alone cannot solve.

To cut through MVP debates, apply a simple test: What is the problem? What is its cause? What solution addresses it? If you can remove a feature component and the core problem is still solved, it is not part of the MVP. If not, it is essential.