Don't view customer escalations as a nuisance; they are a valuable gift. Each one provides a critical opportunity to find and fix not just a specific bug, but the underlying process failure that allowed it to happen. Leaders should actively encourage customers to escalate issues directly to them.
Related Insights
Customers are guarded with salespeople for fear of being sold. However, they are candid with customer service, freely sharing complaints and unmet needs. This makes the CS department an invaluable, and often untapped, source of sales intelligence and expansion opportunities.
When facing a significant customer service issue with a brand you care about, bypass standard channels and email the founder or CEO. Frame your feedback constructively. High-level leaders are often disconnected from front-line issues and appreciate direct, actionable feedback, leading to white-glove service and a faster, more favorable resolution.
To empower your team, enforce the '1-3-1 rule' for problem-solving. Before anyone can escalate an issue to you, they must define the one problem, research three potential solutions, and present their single best recommendation. This forces critical thinking and shifts the team from problem-spotters to problem-solvers.
When a customer expresses dissatisfaction or feels they need more support, position a higher-tier service as the specific solution to their problem. This turns a potential churn risk into a revenue expansion event.
Most engineers only interact with customers during negative events like outages or escalations. To build customer empathy and a product mindset, leaders must intentionally create positive touchpoints. This includes sending engineers to customer conferences or including them on low-stakes customer calls.
Focus on the root cause (the "first-order issue") rather than symptoms or a long to-do list. Solving this core problem, like fixing website technology instead of cutting content, often resolves multiple downstream issues simultaneously.
To prevent a culture of complaining, Coinbase requires employees to document issues using a "Problem, Proposed Solution" framework. This forces individuals to move beyond simple criticism and contribute constructively, ensuring that dissent is paired with a thoughtful potential solution.
Don't be afraid to surface problems to executives, as their job is almost entirely focused on what's not working. Withholding a problem is unhelpful; clarifying and framing it is incredibly valuable. Your champion isn't offending their boss by raising an issue, they're demonstrating strategic awareness.
When a customer has an issue, the instinct can be to defend your process or prove they are mistaken. This is flawed. The focus should be on resolving the situation and making the customer feel heard, not on who was technically correct. The goal is to solve, not to win the argument.
When handling an outage or escalation, the biggest threat to customer trust isn't the problem, but a chaotic internal response. Instill a "clarity over chaos" rule by designating one leader, one channel, and one message. A calm, owned response builds more credibility than a hundred smooth weeks.
