Evidence suggests that much of what people claim as post-traumatic growth is an imaginary coping mechanism. It's a way to rationalize suffering and reduce cognitive dissonance, rather than a true, observable transformation in thinking, feeling, or action.

Trauma is not an objective property of an event but a subjective experience created by the relationship between a present situation and past memories. Because experience is a combination of sensory input and remembered past, changing the meaning or narrative of past events can change the experience of trauma itself.

The jarring transition from a high-stress state to a relaxed one can be so uncomfortable that people subconsciously choose to remain in a state of low-grade, constant stress. This psychological principle, "contrast avoidance theory," explains why it feels so difficult to switch off. Recognizing this discomfort as a temporary transitional phase is key to breaking the cycle.

The neural systems evolved for physical survival—managing pain, fear, and strategic threats—are the same ones activated during modern stressors like workplace arguments or relationship conflicts. The challenges have changed from starvation to spreadsheets, but the underlying brain hardware hasn't.

Beyond simple resilience, "post-traumatic growth" is the scientifically-backed idea that all humans can use adversity to build a psychological immune system. Overcoming challenges creates a memory of capability, making you better equipped to handle future adversity, from losing a deal to losing a job.

The brain doesn't strive for objective, verbatim recall. Instead, it constantly updates and modifies memories, infusing them with emotional context and takeaways. This process isn't a bug; its purpose is to create useful models to guide future decisions and ensure survival.

Distinguish between everyday impulses (often unreliable) and true intuition, which becomes a powerful survival guide during genuine crises. Our hardwired survival mechanisms provide clarity when stakes are highest, a state difficult to replicate in non-crisis situations.

Anxiety is not always a pathology but can be a purposeful signal. A study on chimps showed that removing the most sensitive, anxious members led to the entire group's demise, as they were the advance warning system for dangers. This reframes anxiety as a crucial societal function.

Emotions act as a robust, evolutionarily-programmed value function guiding human decision-making. The absence of this function, as seen in brain damage cases, leads to a breakdown in practical agency. This suggests a similar mechanism may be crucial for creating effective and stable AI agents.