To effectively lead multicultural teams, be authentic, as people can sense fakeness. However, you must adapt your communication delivery for different cultural contexts. Understanding nuances—like why a team in Japan might be silent on a call—is crucial for building trust and avoiding misinterpretation.
Related Insights
When managing teams across different cultures (e.g., US, Taiwan, Japan), a leader can bypass complex cultural frameworks by simply asking each person, 'What's the best way for me to deliver feedback to you?' This personalizes communication, eliminates guesswork, and demonstrates respect.
Showing up as your "full self" in every situation is ineffective. A better approach is "strategic authenticity," where you adjust your communication style to suit the context (e.g., a board meeting vs. a team lunch) without compromising your fundamental values.
If your natural communication style can be misconstrued (e.g., direct, quiet, transactional), preface interactions by explicitly stating it. For example, "I tend to go straight to action mode." This provides crucial context, manages others' perceptions, and gives you permission to be authentic.
An executive who moved from Chicago to Tokyo felt like an imposter and considered changing his leadership style. The best advice he received was the opposite: lean in *more* to who you are. Authenticity is a universal language that transcends cultural and professional barriers.
Effective leadership isn't about one fixed style. It’s about accurately reading a situation and adapting your approach—whether to be directive, empathetic, or demanding. Great leaders know that leading senior executives requires a different approach than managing new graduates.
The "treat others as you want to be treated" mantra fails in leadership because individuals have different motivations and work styles. Effective leaders adapt their approach, recognizing that their preferred hands-off style might not work for someone who needs more direct guidance.
The core challenge for global teams isn't overt issues like time zones, but hidden ones. Members often lack the local context to correctly interpret information from colleagues, creating "blind spots" where they "don't know what they don't know," leading to misunderstandings and flawed decisions.
When a big-picture leader communicates with a detail-oriented team, friction is inevitable. Recognizing this as a clash of communication styles—not a personal failing or lack of competence—is the first step. Adaptation, rather than frustration, becomes the solution.
Effective collaboration in global teams depends on "mutual adaptation." This isn't just about communicating; it requires members to constantly be in a mindset of both teaching colleagues about their own context and perspective, while actively learning about their collaborators' situations.
When a team has members from 10+ countries, country-specific 'do's and don'ts' are useless. The effective strategy is developing broad cultural intelligence: slowing down, listening more than talking, and using inquiry to ensure mutual understanding with any colleague, regardless of their origin.