Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Zipline considers candidate-provided references to be useless ("paid references"). Instead, they invest significant time to network their way to former colleagues not on the official list. These blind references provide brutally honest feedback, revealing both A+ players and those who "leave a trail of destruction."

Related Insights

Candidates are more likely to be fully transparent with an external recruiter than with a potential employer. The recruiter acts as a trusted intermediary, allowing them to gather honest feedback on compensation, role, and concerns, which is critical for closing top talent.

Standard reference checks yield generic praise. To identify true A-players, ask their former colleagues a high-stakes question: “Would you quit your current job to work for this person again?” An enthusiastic “yes” is the strongest hiring signal you can get.

For hiring, Scott Galloway advocates for prioritizing "reference hiring" above all else. He trusts a strong recommendation from a credible source so much that he considers the candidate an "80, 90% lock on the job" before they even interview. This suggests vetted referrals are a far more reliable signal of quality than traditional interview performance.

To assess a leader's ability to spot talent, Zipline asks about their past hires and looks them up on LinkedIn. A powerful positive signal is if the candidate's former reports have achieved massive success themselves, such as getting promoted five times and now leading a 5,000-person division.

Standard reference calls are predictably positive. To get the truth, ask the reference, "What job do we need to hire next to help this person be successful?" The description of the required role will almost always be a perfect antonym of the candidate's skills, revealing their weaknesses.

To avoid hypothetical interview questions, Zipline makes its hiring process as applied as possible. This includes pair programming, collaborative design sessions, and even offering paid 1-2 week work trials. This "work together" approach quickly reveals a candidate's true fit and capabilities.

An expensive mis-hire came from a friend's referral. The speaker realized that while she trusted her friends, they lacked the deep marketing expertise to properly evaluate the candidate's skills. This highlights the need to critically assess a referrer's own qualifications in the relevant domain, not just rely on the relationship.

Interviews can be misleading as founders are skilled at presenting well. Venture investor Naveen Chaddha relies heavily on extensive back-channel references to create an "X-ray" of a founder's history. He believes that while founders can craft a narrative, they cannot hide from their past actions and reputation.

Senior executives are, by definition, excellent at interviewing, making the process unreliable for signal. Instead of relying on a polished performance, ask to see the 360-degree performance reviews from their previous company. This provides a more honest, ground-truth assessment of their strengths and weaknesses.

Standard reference checks yield polite platitudes. To elicit honesty, frame the call around the high stakes for both your company and the candidate. Emphasize that a bad fit hurts the candidate's career and wastes everyone's time. This forces the reference to provide a more candid, risk-assessed answer.