Define different agents (e.g., Designer, Engineer, Executive) with unique instructions and perspectives, then task them with reviewing a document in parallel. This generates diverse, structured feedback that mimics a real-world team review, surfacing potential issues from multiple viewpoints simultaneously.
Related Insights
Instead of generic PRD generators, a high-leverage AI agent for PMs is a personalized reviewer. By training an agent on your manager's past document reviews, you can pre-empt their specific feedback, align your work with their priorities, and increase your credibility and efficiency.
Treat advanced AI systems not as software with binary outcomes, but as a new employee with a unique persona. They can offer diverse, non-obvious insights and a different "chain of thought," sometimes finding issues even human experts miss and providing complementary perspectives.
Top-performing engineering teams are evolving from hands-on coding to a managerial role. Their primary job is to define tasks, kick off multiple AI agents in parallel, review plans, and approve the final output, rather than implementing the details themselves.
Using AI agents in shared Slack channels transforms coding from a solo activity into a collaborative one. Multiple team members can observe the agent's work, provide corrective feedback in the same thread, and collectively guide the task to completion, fostering shared knowledge.
Building a single, all-purpose AI is like hiring one person for every company role. To maximize accuracy and creativity, build multiple custom GPTs, each trained for a specific function like copywriting or operations, and have them collaborate.
Create AI agents that embody key executive personas to monitor operations. A 'CFO agent' could audit for cost efficiency while a 'brand agent' checks for compliance. This system surfaces strategic conflicts that require a human-in-the-loop to arbitrate, ensuring alignment.
To improve the quality and accuracy of an AI agent's output, spawn multiple sub-agents with competing or adversarial roles. For example, a code review agent finds bugs, while several "auditor" agents check for false positives, resulting in a more reliable final analysis.
Separating AI agents into distinct roles (e.g., a technical expert and a customer-facing communicator) mirrors real-world team specializations. This allows for tailored configurations, like different 'temperature' settings for creativity versus accuracy, improving overall performance and preventing role confusion.
Instead of relying on a single, all-purpose coding agent, the most effective workflow involves using different agents for their specific strengths. For example, using the 'Friday' agent for UI tasks, 'Charlie' for code reviews, and 'Claude Code' for research and backend logic.
Instead of generating static text, Claude 4.5 can build interactive, shareable web apps like customer persona guides or campaign dashboards. This transforms the AI's role from a personal assistant into a central tool for team alignment and decision-making, as these "artifacts" can be easily distributed to stakeholders.
