Building a single, all-purpose AI is like hiring one person for every company role. To maximize accuracy and creativity, build multiple custom GPTs, each trained for a specific function like copywriting or operations, and have them collaborate.
Related Insights
True Agentic AI isn't a single, all-powerful bot. It's an orchestrated system of multiple, specialized agents, each performing a single task (e.g., qualifying, booking, analyzing). This 'division of labor,' mirroring software engineering principles, creates a more robust, scalable, and manageable automation pipeline.
When building Spiral, a single large language model trying to both interview the user and write content failed due to "context rot." The solution was a multi-agent system where an "interviewer" agent hands off the full context to a separate "writer" agent, improving performance and reliability.
While consolidating tools seems efficient, using specialized, best-in-class AI agents for each GTM function (one for outbound, one for inbound) yields superior results. The depth and focus of specialized tools enable more powerful and nuanced use cases, justifying the management overhead of multiple systems.
A 'GenAI solves everything' mindset is flawed. High-latency models are unsuitable for real-time operational needs, like optimizing a warehouse worker's scanning path, which requires millisecond responses. The key is to apply the right tool—be it an optimizer, machine learning, or GenAI—to the specific business problem.
Don't view AI tools as just software; treat them like junior team members. Apply management principles: 'hire' the right model for the job (People), define how it should work through structured prompts (Process), and give it a clear, narrow goal (Purpose). This mental model maximizes their effectiveness.
For marketing, resist the allure of all-in-one AI platforms. The best results currently come from a specialized stack of hyper-focused tools, each excelling at a single task like image generation or presentation creation. Combine their outputs for superior quality.
Separating AI agents into distinct roles (e.g., a technical expert and a customer-facing communicator) mirrors real-world team specializations. This allows for tailored configurations, like different 'temperature' settings for creativity versus accuracy, improving overall performance and preventing role confusion.
Instead of relying on a single, all-purpose coding agent, the most effective workflow involves using different agents for their specific strengths. For example, using the 'Friday' agent for UI tasks, 'Charlie' for code reviews, and 'Claude Code' for research and backend logic.
Treat generative AI not as a single assistant, but as an army. When prototyping or brainstorming, open several different AI tools in parallel windows with similar prompts. This allows you to juggle and cross-pollinate ideas, effectively 'riffing' with multiple assistants at once to accelerate creative output and overcome latency.
Instead of offering a model selector, creating a proprietary, branded model allows a company to chain different specialized models for various sub-tasks (e.g., search, generation). This not only improves overall performance but also provides business independence from the pricing and launch cycles of a single frontier model lab.
