Arctos Partners' 10-level framework shows that firms at the same complexity level (e.g., a Level 8 infrastructure fund and a Level 8 buyout fund) face more similar market pressures and organizational challenges than firms with the same investment strategy but different complexity levels.
Related Insights
The private markets industry is bifurcating. General Partners (GPs) must either scale massively with broad distribution to sell multiple products, or focus on a highly differentiated, unique strategy. The middle ground—being a mid-sized, undifferentiated firm—is becoming the most difficult position to defend.
Prelude Growth Partners' framework avoids investments with product, category, or brand risk. Instead, they focus on opportunities where the primary uncertainty is execution, as they believe they can actively help mitigate that risk post-investment. This clarifies the type of risk growth capital should take on.
The primary risk to a VC fund's performance isn't its absolute size but rather a dramatic increase (e.g., doubling) from one fund to the next. This forces firms to change their strategy and write larger checks than their conviction muscle is built for.
Instead of just telling portfolio company leaders what to do, effective PE operators 'show' them how with specific frameworks, tools, and process examples. This visual and systematic approach is more effective than verbal direction alone and accelerates the implementation of value-creating activities.
A fund-of-funds' back office is more complex than a direct VC fund's. Critical decisions around over-commitment strategies, capital recycling, and specialized fund formation are not just operational details—they directly influence final returns for LPs. Getting this specialized setup wrong can significantly mute performance.
Superior returns can come from a firm's structure, not just its stock picks. By designing incentive systems and processes that eliminate 'alpha drags'—like short-term pressures, misaligned compensation, and herd behavior—a firm can create a durable, structural competitive advantage that boosts performance.
The 15 largest PE firms control 20% of industry AUM and have mastered capital aggregation through insurance and wealth channels. Their primary business challenge is now deploying this capital into enough quality deals, while every other firm still struggles to raise funds.
In private equity, capital is the ultimate commodity. The most effective way to differentiate is through deep, singular industry specialization. This expertise generates inbound deal flow, allows for unique value-add post-acquisition, and creates a memorable brand that resonates with sellers.
The era of generating returns through leverage and multiple expansion is over. Future success in PE will come from driving revenue growth, entering at lower multiples, and adding operational expertise, particularly in the fragmented middle market where these opportunities are more prevalent.
Shifting capital between asset classes based on relative value is powerful but operationally difficult. It demands a "coordination tax"—a significant organizational effort to ensure different teams price risk comparably and collaborate. This runs counter to the industry's typical siloed, product-focused structure.