Founders often see franchising as a way to scale without managing more employees. However, it shifts the people problem to managing franchisees. This requires enforcing brand standards and managing underperformers who are also business owners, a group that can consume 80% of your time.
Related Insights
Citing Unity's CEO, Adrian Solgaard highlights the "messy middle" of scaling (from 12 to 100 employees). This awkward phase lacks the intimacy of a small startup and the structure of a large corporation, requiring a difficult leadership transition that founders often struggle with.
When founders claim a proven but labor-intensive channel 'doesn't scale,' they often misdiagnose a resourcing problem. The bottleneck isn't the channel's viability but their inability to solve the operational challenge of hiring, training, and managing a team to execute that channel at massive volume.
Conventional scaling crushes founders by making them hold everything. Instead, invert the model: create a supportive architecture where your frameworks hold your work, which in turn holds you. This 'nesting bowl' approach enables scaling without feeling responsible for holding everything yourself.
Many entrepreneurs love their core business but lose motivation as their role expands to include responsibilities they dislike (e.g., finance, operations). The solution is to reinvest early profits into hiring employees to handle these tasks, freeing the founder to focus on their strengths and passions.
The primary goal of hiring should be to reclaim the founder's time from low-value tasks. This frees up the business's most valuable asset—the founder—to focus on high-leverage activities that truly drive growth, rather than simply adding capacity.
A founder's role is constantly changing—from individual contributor to manager to culture builder. Success requires being self-aware enough to recognize you're always in a new, unfamiliar role you're not yet good at. Sticking to the old job you mastered is a primary cause of failure to scale.
Founders are "unicorns" with unique skill sets impossible to hire for in a single person. To scale and remove yourself as a bottleneck, break your responsibilities into their component parts (e.g., sales, marketing, product) and hire specialists for each, assembling a team that approximates your output, even at a lower margin.
Business growth isn't linear. Scaling up introduces novel challenges in complexity, cost, and logistics that were non-existent at a smaller size. For example, doubling manufacturing capacity creates new shipping and specialized hiring problems that leadership must anticipate and solve.
Founders often fear scaling a service business because they believe only they can provide the 'personal touch.' This is an ego-driven bottleneck. The correct approach is to hire, accept that mistakes will happen, fire underperformers, and use sincere apologies and refunds to repair client relationships. Service failures are a predictable cost of scaling.