When founders claim a proven but labor-intensive channel 'doesn't scale,' they often misdiagnose a resourcing problem. The bottleneck isn't the channel's viability but their inability to solve the operational challenge of hiring, training, and managing a team to execute that channel at massive volume.
Related Insights
Resist hiring quickly after finding traction. Instead, 'hire painfully slowly' and assemble an initial 'MVP Crew' — a small, self-sufficient team with all skills needed to build, market, and sell the product end-to-end. This establishes a core DNA of speed and execution before scaling.
As a company grows, its old operational systems and processes ('plumbing') become obsolete. True scaling is not about addition; it's about reinvention. This involves systematically removing outdated processes designed for a smaller scale and replacing them entirely.
According to the 'dark side' of Metcalfe's Law, each new team member exponentially increases the number of communication channels. This hidden cost of complexity often outweighs the added capacity, leading to more miscommunication and lost information. Improving operational efficiency is often a better first step than hiring.
Investors like Stacy Brown-Philpot and Aileen Lee now expect founders to demonstrate a clear, rapid path to massive scale early on. The old assumption that the next funding round would solve for scalability is gone; proof is required upfront.
Founders are "unicorns" with unique skill sets impossible to hire for in a single person. To scale and remove yourself as a bottleneck, break your responsibilities into their component parts (e.g., sales, marketing, product) and hire specialists for each, assembling a team that approximates your output, even at a lower margin.
Business growth isn't linear. Scaling up introduces novel challenges in complexity, cost, and logistics that were non-existent at a smaller size. For example, doubling manufacturing capacity creates new shipping and specialized hiring problems that leadership must anticipate and solve.
Founders often fear scaling a service business because they believe only they can provide the 'personal touch.' This is an ego-driven bottleneck. The correct approach is to hire, accept that mistakes will happen, fire underperformers, and use sincere apologies and refunds to repair client relationships. Service failures are a predictable cost of scaling.
A founder's ability to sell is not proof of a scalable business. The real litmus test for repeatability is when a non-founder sales hire can close a deal from start to finish. This signals that the value proposition and process are teachable, which is the first true sign of a scalable go-to-market motion.
