Analysts pointing to low OECD oil inventories are using an outdated five-year average. Permanent refinery closures since 2020 have structurally reduced inventory needs, meaning current stock levels are actually sufficient for the smaller refining base and are not a bullish signal for prices.
The oil industry's boom-bust cycle is self-perpetuating. Low prices cause companies to slash investment and lead to a talent drain as workers leave the volatile sector. This underinvestment, combined with natural production declines, inevitably leads to tighter markets and price spikes years later.
Despite new US sanctions on Russian oil producers, Goldman Sachs remains bearish, forecasting a decline. They argue that spare capacity from OPEC, exemptions for buyers, and the reorganization of trade networks will mitigate any supply disruption, preventing a sustained price spike and leading to lower prices by 2026.
Despite the absence of a real surplus, oil prices are unlikely to surge. China has built massive strategic reserves and consistently sells from them when Brent crude moves above $70 per barrel. This acts as a ceiling on the market, creating a range-bound environment for prices in the $60s.
Despite healthy global oil demand, J.P. Morgan maintains a bearish outlook because supply is forecast to expand at three times the rate of demand. This oversupply creates such a large market imbalance that prices must fall to enforce production cuts and rebalance the market.
Analysts create a false “manufactured surplus” by misinterpreting data. They incorrectly count US Strategic Petroleum Reserve additions as market supply and fail to recognize China's massive inventory buildup as a strategic reserve for war or sanctions, not commercial oversupply.
The oil market's lack of reaction to the events in Venezuela demonstrates a key principle: short-to-medium term prices are driven by current production and delivery capacity, not the theoretical size of underground reserves that may take years and billions to develop.
Contrary to bearish sentiment, oil demand has consistently exceeded expectations. The market's weakness stems from a supply glut, primarily from the Americas, which has outpaced demand growth by more than twofold, leading to a structural surplus and significant inventory builds.
Contrary to market fears of forced production cuts, Russia's recent drilling slowdown is not a sign of structural decline. It reflects a temporary redirection of capital expenditure towards refinery repairs following drone attacks, while overall drilling activity remains at historically high levels.
The constraint on US shale isn't just production volume; it's a "refining wall." US refineries lack the capacity to process additional light sweet crude, forcing it to be exported. This creates a demand-side peak for this specific crude type within the US, independent of geological supply limits.
Analysts misinterpret rising "oil on water" as a bearish sign. A country shifting exports to a more distant destination (e.g., Brazil to China instead of the US) increases the volume of oil in transit due to longer voyage times, but the actual available supply to the market can be declining.