Analysts misinterpret rising "oil on water" as a bearish sign. A country shifting exports to a more distant destination (e.g., Brazil to China instead of the US) increases the volume of oil in transit due to longer voyage times, but the actual available supply to the market can be declining.
Related Insights
The prospect of reviving Venezuela's vast but dormant oil industry introduces significant potential for increased global supply. Morgan Stanley suggests this could suppress prices in the medium-term, a counter-intuitive outcome where resolving geopolitical tension leads to lower commodity prices rather than higher ones.
Despite healthy global oil demand, J.P. Morgan maintains a bearish outlook because supply is forecast to expand at three times the rate of demand. This oversupply creates such a large market imbalance that prices must fall to enforce production cuts and rebalance the market.
Analysts create a false “manufactured surplus” by misinterpreting data. They incorrectly count US Strategic Petroleum Reserve additions as market supply and fail to recognize China's massive inventory buildup as a strategic reserve for war or sanctions, not commercial oversupply.
Sanctions on major Russian oil companies don't halt exports but instead push them into opaque channels. Russia uses independent traders and restructured ownership to create "unknown" cargos, removing sanctioned company names from documents. This model, proven with smaller firms, maintains export volumes while obscuring the oil's origin.
The return of Venezuelan oil is not bearish. It will take three years to add 1 million barrels per day (bpd), while global demand growth and natural decline rates will require 15 million bpd of new supply. Furthermore, investment in Venezuela will be diverted from other projects, negating the net supply increase.
Contrary to bearish sentiment, oil demand has consistently exceeded expectations. The market's weakness stems from a supply glut, primarily from the Americas, which has outpaced demand growth by more than twofold, leading to a structural surplus and significant inventory builds.
The crude oil market is trapped in a recurring monthly pattern. For the first half of each month, the forward curve weakens on fears of a supply glut, nearly flipping into contango. Then, a sudden geopolitical shock mid-month causes the curve to snap back into pronounced backwardation, delaying the surplus.
Despite his stated goal of lowering oil prices, President Trump's aggressive sanctions on Venezuela, Iran, and Russia have removed significant supply from the market. This creates logistical bottlenecks and "oil on water" buildups, effectively tightening the market and keeping prices higher than they would be otherwise.
Unlike more volatile shale production, large-scale offshore projects from Exxon in Guyana and Petrobras in Brazil are sanctioned years in advance. This provides analysts with a highly reliable and visible pipeline of new, low-cost barrels, cementing the forecast for a sustained supply surplus.
Since the U.S. is a net oil exporter, controlling massive reserves like Venezuela's is less critical. The real power now lies in controlling the flow of oil to adversaries like China, which is dependent on imports and could be crippled by a supply cutoff.
