After a long forbearance period where many new graduates had never made a payment, the resumption of student loans saw delinquency rates spike to over 20%, more than double the historical 10% average. This reflects both immense financial strain and widespread confusion over repayment programs.
Related Insights
Young people feel a sense of betrayal after following the prescribed path—good grades, college—only to graduate with immense debt into a job market with few opportunities and an unaffordable housing market. This broken promise fuels their economic anxiety.
Senator Warren highlights a critical omission in standard economic calculations: the cost of servicing debt. Expenses like credit card interest and student loan payments are often left out, meaning official data doesn't capture the full financial pressure American families are facing.
In large loan portfolios, defaults are not evenly distributed. As seen in a student loan example, the vast majority (90%) of defaults can originate from a specific sub-segment, like for-profit schools, and occur within a predictable timeframe, such as the first 18 months.
Senator Warren highlights a major flaw in how economic stress is measured: the cost of servicing debt from credit cards and student loans is often excluded from calculations. This omission masks a huge financial burden on families, making their economic situation appear healthier than it actually is.
Recent stress in credit card and auto loan markets is concentrated in loans originated in 2021-2023 when stimulus and looser standards prevailed. Lenders have since tightened, and newer loan portfolios are performing better, suggesting the problem is not spreading systemically.
A surge in student loan delinquency rates to double-digit levels indicates significant financial distress, particularly for the middle third of the income distribution. These borrowers are forced to prioritize essential expenses like housing over their loan payments, revealing a deepening affordability crisis.
To fix the student debt crisis, universities should be financially on the hook for the first portion of any loan default (e.g., $20,000). This "first loss" position would compel them to underwrite the economic viability of their own degrees, creating a powerful market check against pushing students into overpriced and low-value programs.
While lower-income households were hit first by inflation, a subsequent rise in delinquencies among middle and high-income groups signaled a deeper economic issue. It showed that sustained cost pressures were depleting even larger savings buffers, indicating the strain was not temporary or confined to one segment.
While the overall debt service ratio appears low, this average is skewed by high-income households with minimal debt. Lower and middle-income families are facing significant financial pressure and rising delinquencies, a critical detail missed when only looking at macroeconomic aggregates.
The problem isn't that college is inherently bad, but that the U.S. system creates a moral hazard. Government-guaranteed, non-dischargeable loans remove any incentive for universities to be competitive on price or deliver value, allowing them to become "parasitic" organizations that saddle students with crippling debt.
