While the overall debt service ratio appears low, this average is skewed by high-income households with minimal debt. Lower and middle-income families are facing significant financial pressure and rising delinquencies, a critical detail missed when only looking at macroeconomic aggregates.
Related Insights
Default rates are not uniform. High-yield bonds are low due to a 2020 "cleansing." Leveraged loans show elevated defaults due to higher rates. Private credit defaults are masked but may be as high as 6%, indicated by "bad PIK" amendments, suggesting hidden stress.
Senator Warren highlights a critical omission in standard economic calculations: the cost of servicing debt. Expenses like credit card interest and student loan payments are often left out, meaning official data doesn't capture the full financial pressure American families are facing.
The credit market appears healthy based on tight average spreads, but this is misleading. A strong top 90% of the market pulls the average down, while the bottom 10% faces severe distress, with loans "dropping like a stone." The weight of prolonged high borrowing costs is creating a clear divide between healthy and struggling companies.
In large loan portfolios, defaults are not evenly distributed. As seen in a student loan example, the vast majority (90%) of defaults can originate from a specific sub-segment, like for-profit schools, and occur within a predictable timeframe, such as the first 18 months.
Senator Warren highlights a major flaw in how economic stress is measured: the cost of servicing debt from credit cards and student loans is often excluded from calculations. This omission masks a huge financial burden on families, making their economic situation appear healthier than it actually is.
The common debt-to-GDP ratio inappropriately compares a balance sheet item (debt, a stock) to an income statement item (GDP, a flow). Laffer argues for more accurate comparisons like debt-to-wealth (stock-to-stock) or debt service-to-GDP (flow-to-flow) for a proper assessment of a nation's financial health.
Navy Federal's data reveals that middle-class spending on the low-cost e-commerce site TEMU has "nosedived." This shift away from even the cheapest online options indicates that this demographic has exhausted its excess savings and is now under significant financial pressure, forcing them to consolidate spending at retailers like Walmart and Costco.
The top 10% of earners, who drive 50% of consumer spending, can slash discretionary purchases overnight based on stock market fluctuations. This makes the economy more volatile than one supported by the stable, non-discretionary spending of the middle class, creating systemic fragility.
The dramatic rise in BNPL usage across all demographics, including 41% of young shoppers, is a negative forward-looking indicator. While framed as innovation, it's a form of modern usury that reveals consumers cannot afford their purchases, creating a significant, under-discussed credit risk for the economy.
With the top 10% of earners accounting for half of all consumer spending, the U.S. economy has become dangerously top-heavy. This concentration creates systemic risk, as a stock market downturn or even a minor shift toward caution among this small group could trigger a sharp recession, with no offsetting demand from the rest of the population.