There is no inherent conflict between speed and quality. High-quality studies prevent costly setbacks and generate reliable data, ultimately accelerating research programs. A low-quality study is what truly delays timelines by producing unusable or misleading results.

A key principle of lean management is "Genba" (go and see). To truly improve a process, leaders must be physically present, observing and talking with the people who perform the tasks daily. Speculating from an office based on data alone leads to ineffective or out-of-touch changes.

Before automating a manual process, leaders should deeply engage with the people on the line. These operators possess invaluable, often un-documented, knowledge about process nuances and potential failure modes that are critical for a successful automation project.

At Rainbird, engineers build the first 'production intent' units for field trials themselves, on the actual assembly line. This serves two critical functions: it produces the necessary test units and simultaneously allows the engineering team to validate and debug the manufacturing process before scaling up.

The conventional wisdom that you must sacrifice one of quality, price, or speed is flawed. High-performance teams reject this trade-off, understanding that improving quality is the primary lever. Higher quality reduces rework and defects, which naturally leads to lower long-term costs and faster delivery, creating a virtuous cycle.

To ensure a smooth transition from development to production, an operations or manufacturing SME must be part of the design process from the start. Otherwise, products are developed without manufacturability in mind, leading to expensive, reactive fixes and subjective quality control during scale-up.

This quote from quality guru Edwards Deming posits that undesirable results are a feature of a perfectly designed system, not a bug or human error. To improve outcomes, product leaders must analyze and redesign the underlying processes rather than blaming their teams.

Companies, especially in early stages, should resist outsourcing production too quickly. Keeping a new process in-house is essential for understanding its pain points, which is a prerequisite for being able to specify clear, effective requirements to an external vendor later on.

Don't accept the excuse that moving faster means sacrificing quality. The best performers, particularly in engineering, deliver both high speed and high quality. Leaders should demand both, framing it as an expectation for top talent, not an impossible choice.