Social media algorithms amplify negativity by optimizing for "revealed preference" (what you click on, e.g., car crashes). AI models, however, operate on aspirational choice (what you explicitly ask for). This fundamental difference means AI can reflect a more complex and wholesome version of humanity.

Social media algorithms can be trained. By actively blocking or marking unwanted content as "not interested," users can transform their "for you" page from a source of distracting content into a valuable, curated feed of recommended information.

The addictiveness of social media stems from algorithms that strategically mix positive content, like cute animal videos, with enraging content. This emotional whiplash keeps users glued to their phones, as outrage is a powerful driver of engagement that platforms deliberately exploit to keep users scrolling.

Algorithms increasingly serve content to non-followers based on their interests, not just social connections. To succeed, marketers must shift from engaging existing followers to creating "recommendable" content that appeals to a broader, topic-focused audience.

Treat each person in your life as their own unique social media platform. This mental model helps you consciously choose which "feeds" you engage with, allowing you to curate your informational and energetic diet as deliberately as you manage apps on your phone.

LinkedIn's algorithm has shifted. It no longer penalizes content you ignore (a negative signal). Instead, it exclusively uses positive signals—what you actively engage with—to determine your feed, making intentional engagement more critical than ever for shaping your content visibility.

When social media reach and engagement decline, it's easy to blame the platform's algorithm. However, the more productive mindset is to see it as a reflection of your content's declining quality or relevance. The algorithm isn't hurting everyone, it's hurting those who aren't good. The solution is to improve your craft, innovate, and adapt to cultural trends.

People blame algorithms for negativity, but the algorithm is a neutral mirror reflecting your own interests. It doesn't push content on you; it exposes what you already pay attention to. If your feed is toxic, you are the problem.

Stop viewing 'the algorithm' and 'the audience' as separate forces. The algorithm is simply a neutral, black-and-white feedback mechanism that reports on how well your content resonated with people. Success comes from focusing on the audience, and the algorithm's 'score' will reflect that.