The addictiveness of social media stems from algorithms that strategically mix positive content, like cute animal videos, with enraging content. This emotional whiplash keeps users glued to their phones, as outrage is a powerful driver of engagement that platforms deliberately exploit to keep users scrolling.
A primary danger of AI is its ability to offer young men 'low friction' relationships with AI characters. This circumvents the messy, difficult, but necessary process of real-world interaction, stunting the development of social skills and resilience that are forged through the friction of human connection.
The true power of an economic boycott lies not in its direct revenue loss, which is often negligible (around a 1% stock decline). Its effectiveness comes from creating negative media attention that pressures corporate leaders to reverse decisions in order to quell the public relations crisis.
Social platforms are declining as places for genuine connection, shifting to AI-generated 'slop' and content from strangers. Their business model remains viable not by improving the user's social experience, but by using AI to become so effective at ad targeting that even mindless engagement is highly monetizable.
For a consumer spending strike to impact the economy, it must mobilize the wealthiest 10% of Americans. This group accounts for half of all consumer spending and can easily reduce discretionary purchases. In contrast, the middle class has little room to cut essentials like rent and groceries, making them a less effective target for such actions.
Instead of forcing AI companies to subsidize electricity bills directly, a more effective solution is a broad-based corporate minimum tax. This provides the public capital needed for massive infrastructure projects, like upgrading the national power grid to handle increased demand from data centers, without complex, targeted regulations.