To get higher-quality input from busy medical experts, use specialized AI tools like Consensus.app to review scientific literature first. Then, present your tentative conclusions to the professional, demonstrating you've done the preliminary work, which encourages a more thoughtful and detailed response.
Related Insights
After running a survey, feed the raw results file and your original list of hypotheses into an AI model. It can perform an initial pass to validate or disprove each hypothesis, providing a confidence score and flagging the most interesting findings, which massively accelerates the analysis phase.
A powerful workflow is to explicitly instruct your AI to act as a collaborative thinking partner—asking questions and organizing thoughts—while strictly forbidding it from creating final artifacts. This separates the crucial thinking phase from the generative phase, leading to better outcomes.
Text descriptions of physical pain are often vague. To improve an AI coach's helpfulness, use multi-modal inputs. Uploading a photo and circling the exact point of pain or a video showing limited range of motion provides far more precise context than words alone.
An effective AI strategy in healthcare is not limited to consumer-facing assistants. A critical focus is building tools to augment the clinicians themselves. An AI 'assistant' for doctors to surface information and guide decisions scales expertise and improves care quality from the inside out.
Treat AI as a critique partner. After synthesizing research, explain your takeaways and then ask the AI to analyze the same raw data to report on patterns, themes, or conclusions you didn't mention. This is a powerful method for revealing analytical blind spots.
Instead of viewing AI collaboration as a manager delegating tasks, adopt the "surgeon" model. The human expert performs the critical, hands-on work while AI assistants handle prep (briefings, drafts) and auxiliary tasks. This keeps the expert in a state of flow and focused on their unique skills.
AI models tend to be overly optimistic. To get a balanced market analysis, explicitly instruct AI research tools like Perplexity to act as a "devil's advocate." This helps uncover risks, challenge assumptions, and makes it easier for product managers to say "no" to weak ideas quickly.
Instead of replacing experts, AI can reformat their advice. It can take a doctor's diagnosis and transform it into a digestible, day-by-day plan tailored to a user's specific goals and timeline, making complex medical guidance easier to follow.
Don't use AI to generate generic thought leadership, which often just regurgitates existing content. The real power is using AI as a 'steroid' for your own ideas. Architect the core content yourself, then use AI to turbocharge research and data integration to make it 10x better.
Instead of just asking an AI to write a PRD, first provide it with a "Socratic questioning" template. The LLM will then act as a thinking partner, asking challenging, open-ended questions about the problem and solution. This upfront thinking process results in a significantly more robust final document.
