Instead of viewing AI collaboration as a manager delegating tasks, adopt the "surgeon" model. The human expert performs the critical, hands-on work while AI assistants handle prep (briefings, drafts) and auxiliary tasks. This keeps the expert in a state of flow and focused on their unique skills.
Related Insights
Treating AI coding tools like an asynchronous junior engineer, rather than a synchronous pair programmer, sets correct expectations. This allows users to delegate tasks, go to meetings, and check in later, enabling true multi-threading of work without the need to babysit the tool.
A powerful workflow is to explicitly instruct your AI to act as a collaborative thinking partner—asking questions and organizing thoughts—while strictly forbidding it from creating final artifacts. This separates the crucial thinking phase from the generative phase, leading to better outcomes.
Avoid using AI to create sales outreach from scratch ('black pen'). Instead, use it as an editor ('red pen'). Apply the 10-80-10 rule: 10% human-led prompting, 80% AI-driven task execution, and a final 10% human refinement. This maintains quality while boosting efficiency.
High productivity isn't about using AI for everything. It's a disciplined workflow: breaking a task into sub-problems, using an LLM for high-leverage parts like scaffolding and tests, and reserving human focus for the core implementation. This avoids the sunk cost of forcing AI on unsuitable tasks.
Treat advanced AI systems not as software with binary outcomes, but as a new employee with a unique persona. They can offer diverse, non-obvious insights and a different "chain of thought," sometimes finding issues even human experts miss and providing complementary perspectives.
A tangible way to implement a "more human" AI strategy is to use automation to free up employee time from repetitive tasks. This saved time should then be deliberately reallocated to high-value, human-centric activities, such as providing personalized customer consultations, that technology cannot replicate.
Don't use AI to generate generic thought leadership, which often just regurgitates existing content. The real power is using AI as a 'steroid' for your own ideas. Architect the core content yourself, then use AI to turbocharge research and data integration to make it 10x better.
The ideal AI-powered engineering workflow isn't just one tool, but a fluid cycle. It involves synchronous collaboration with an AI for planning and review, then handing off to an asynchronous agent for implementation and testing, before returning to synchronous mode for the next phase.
The true ROI of AI isn't just efficiency; it's the opportunity to reallocate time from low-value tasks to uniquely human activities. Use the bandwidth gained to build deeper client relationships, foster community, and engage in creative work.
Adopt a 'more intelligent, more human' framework. For every process made more intelligent through AI automation, strategically reinvest the freed-up human capacity into higher-touch, more personalized customer activities. This creates a balanced system that enhances both efficiency and relationships.
