Bug Crowd's founder learned his Australian VC pitch, focused on predictable ROI (a "sausage machine"), fell flat in the US. American VCs wanted a massive, category-creating vision. He had to reframe his pitch from a "better pen test" to a fundamental shift in the "future of work" for cybersecurity to succeed.
Related Insights
The firm's thesis focuses on a rare founder type: a technical expert who also deeply understands how new technologies shift human behavior. This avoids the common pitfall of building technology in search of a problem, leading to products with innate market pull.
The current fundraising environment is the most binary in recent memory. Startups with the "right" narrative—AI-native, elite incubator pedigree, explosive growth—get funded easily. Companies with solid but non-hype metrics, like classic SaaS growers, are finding it nearly impossible to raise capital. The middle market has vanished.
In a security marketplace, customers don't *want* to find the "product" (vulnerabilities), creating a negative feedback loop unlike eBay. Bug Crowd's founder realized the moat couldn't just be network effects; it had to be the proprietary data used to match the right hackers to the right problems, maximizing success for both sides.
Investors like Stacy Brown-Philpot and Aileen Lee now expect founders to demonstrate a clear, rapid path to massive scale early on. The old assumption that the next funding round would solve for scalability is gone; proof is required upfront.
Bug Crowd's founder tested his pitch on Uber drivers. If he could explain his complex cybersecurity company in 30 seconds without jargon and get them to lean in, he knew the message was strong. This simplicity helps even when selling to technical experts who are time-poor and need to explain the product internally.
A core investment framework is to distinguish between 'pull' companies, where the market organically and virally demands the product, and 'push' companies that have to force their solution onto the market. The former indicates stronger product-market fit and a higher potential for efficient, scalable growth.
When evaluating revolutionary ideas, traditional Total Addressable Market (TAM) analysis is useless. VCs should instead bet on founders with a "world-bending vision" capable of inducing a new market, not just capturing an existing one. Have the humility to admit you can't predict market size and instead back the visionary founder.
Early-stage founders may face rejection because a VC has a pre-existing bias against their market. A Buildots founder was told "I'm not going to invest in construction" but was offered a $4M check to pivot to cybersecurity, demonstrating some investors have hard "no-go" zones.
