Gallup data shows historic disengagement among millennials. A focus group revealed the root cause isn't about perks, but a feeling that leaders don't know or care about their potential contributions. They feel they have relevant information but are rarely consulted.

Related Insights

Due to demographic shifts and a post-pandemic re-evaluation of work, employees now hold more power. This requires a fundamental leadership mindset shift: from managing people and processes to enabling their success. High turnover and disengagement are no longer employee problems but leadership failures. A leader's success now depends entirely on the success of their team, meaning 'you work for them'.

Today's leaders are expected to manage employee emotions and take public stances on social issues, roles for which their traditional training did not prepare them. This requires a new skillset centered on empathy and public communication to build trust with a skeptical younger workforce.

A global quantitative study found that the number one factor in making employees feel valued—a key driver of sustainable growth—was having a boss who tells them what to do, not how to do it. This approach, dubbed "treating smart people like they're smart," empowers them to use their own expertise.

Leading large-scale change requires motivating people you don't directly control, such as community partners. This "advanced leadership" skill also applies internally; even paid employees act like volunteers when asked to innovate. Sustained engagement depends on shared purpose, not hierarchical authority.

When leaders ask for input but have already decided on the outcome, it creates a 'charade' of empowerment. This practice is incredibly demotivating for team members who believe they have genuine autonomy, only to find out their work was irrelevant.

Unlike previous generations who respected positional authority, Gen Z grants influence based on connection and trust. They believe the best idea should win, regardless of who it comes from. To lead them effectively, managers must shift from exercising control to building connection, acting as mentors rather than gatekeepers.

Gen Z employees often possess innate authority in modern domains like AI and social media, yet they may lack basic professional maturity and emotional skills, partly due to the pandemic's impact on their development. This paradox requires leaders to coach them on fundamentals while simultaneously leveraging their unique, future-focused insights. Leaders must listen more and coach more.

Analysis shows that approximately 70% of customer churn is not caused by issues with product, service, or pricing. The primary driver is emotional: customers leave because they feel neglected and unimportant. Retention strategies should therefore focus on making clients feel understood and valued, which is often a low-cost, high-impact activity.

Unlike previous generations who valued privacy, employees under 30 expect supervisors to recognize when they are struggling with mental health or burnout and to offer solutions. Two-thirds of this demographic expect this proactive support, forcing a fundamental shift in management style.

When employees feel excluded, the consequence isn't just passive disengagement. It can breed resentment that leads them to withhold crucial ideas, watch things fail without intervening, or even actively work against the organization's interests. Exclusion creates a tangible cost and risk.