The goal for a majority-EV fleet is not viable with current technology. The material requirements for batteries and components are so vast that a US-only transition would consume every scrap of lithium, copper, graphite, and other key minerals produced globally, leaving none for any other country or industry.

While the loss of the tax credit will hurt sales short-term, it also removes the "government mandate" attack line used by politicians. This forces EVs to be judged as just another car, allowing them to compete on their own merits like lower operating costs and better performance.

With a key government subsidy gone, Tesla is using a rental model as a 'try-before-you-buy' tactic. This shift indicates EV companies must now rely on creative sales funnels and direct product experience, rather than financial incentives, to convert hesitant customers.

Palmer Luckey argues the global push for electric vehicles is a massive, potentially misguided bet. He points to the viability of creating cheap, synthetic hydrocarbon fuels which, if successful, would render current EV infrastructure investments a waste of time and money, especially for aviation.

Tesla's price cuts are not just a reaction to competition. They reflect the 'scaled economies shared' model, where cost savings from increased scale and vertical integration are passed to customers. This drives more volume, which in turn enhances the scale advantage in a virtuous, recursive cycle.

While government support helps, China's rapid adoption of Level 2+ smart driving is primarily driven by fierce domestic EV competition. In a crowded market where over half of new car sales are electric, automakers use advanced autonomous features as the most effective means to differentiate and attract consumers.

While China bans many US tech giants, it welcomed Tesla. A compelling theory suggests this was a strategic move to observe and learn Tesla's methods for mass-producing EVs at scale, thereby accelerating the development of domestic champions like BYD, mirroring its past strategy with Apple's iPhone.

Despite devising a clever, IRS-approved leasing scheme to extend EV credits, both companies immediately abandoned the plan after a few senators threatened an investigation. This rapid reversal highlights the auto industry's extreme sensitivity to political pressure, even when legally in the clear.

By hosting an 'Autonomy and AI Day,' Rivian is strategically shifting its narrative from being solely an electric vehicle manufacturer to an AI and technology firm. This rebranding aims to attract a different class of investors and achieve a higher valuation multiple, especially as EV sales growth decelerates.