When governments become top shareholders, corporate focus shifts from pleasing customers to securing political favor and appropriations. R&D budgets are reallocated to lobbying, and market competition devolves from building the best product to playing the policy game most effectively, strangling innovation.

While the loss of the tax credit will hurt sales short-term, it also removes the "government mandate" attack line used by politicians. This forces EVs to be judged as just another car, allowing them to compete on their own merits like lower operating costs and better performance.

With a key government subsidy gone, Tesla is using a rental model as a 'try-before-you-buy' tactic. This shift indicates EV companies must now rely on creative sales funnels and direct product experience, rather than financial incentives, to convert hesitant customers.

When facing government pressure for deals that border on state capitalism, a single CEO gains little by taking a principled stand. Resisting alone will likely lead to their company being punished while competitors comply. The pragmatic move is to play along to ensure long-term survival, despite potential negative effects for the broader economy.

The expired IRA tax credit had strict "Made in America" rules for purchased EVs, but these rules didn't apply to leased vehicles. This loophole allowed consumers to get the subsidy benefit on German-made luxury EVs and others that would not have otherwise qualified.

True corporate values are steadfast principles that guide a company regardless of the political or social climate. Values that are easily discarded when they become controversial are not core values but rather branding exercises. This inauthenticity risks significant consumer backlash when exposed.

The administration killed a tax credit that directly spurred billions in investment for new EV and battery factories, primarily in Republican-led states. This move is described as "the most anti-manufacturing thing that you possibly could do."

The credit's requirements for North American manufacturing and sourcing from trade partners were designed to counter China's dominance in the EV supply chain. Its elimination undermines this strategic goal, leaving tariffs as the primary, less effective tool.

The belief that consumers needed electric versions of familiar gas-guzzling trucks and SUVs led to EVs that were too big, heavy, and expensive. The market is now forcing a pullback from this strategy towards smaller, more efficient, and profitable designs.