Entrepreneurs often have enough new ideas to kill their focus. A tactical solution is maintaining a dedicated document to fully flesh out every new idea as it arises. This process satisfies the creative urge and provides emotional distance, allowing for more objective evaluation later without disrupting current priorities.

To evaluate ideas without getting bogged down, use a simple framework: What is the idea? Why is it important? Who will it impact? Explicitly avoiding the 'how' prevents premature criticism and focuses the discussion on strategic value.

Teams often become 'intellectual piranhas' that critique every new idea to death, stifling innovation. To counter this, use the 'Yes, and...' improv technique from Stanford's Dan Klein. This forces participants to build upon ideas collaboratively rather than shutting them down, fostering a more creative environment.

Create dedicated time for two distinct processes. First, an 'idea development' phase for brainstorming without judgment of budget or feasibility. Only after this phase is complete should you move to a 'refining' phase to assess practicality.

Early-stage ideas are easily killed by practical objections. To prevent this, implement a rule where feedback must begin with "Yes, and...". This forces critics to be additive and constructive, building upon the initial concept rather than immediately shutting it down. It creates space for a bold idea to develop before facing harsh reality checks.

To avoid generic brainstorming outcomes, use AI as a filter for mediocrity. Ask a tool like ChatGPT for the top 10 ideas on a topic, and then explicitly remove those common suggestions from consideration. This forces the team to bypass the obvious and engage in more original, innovative thinking.

Maintain a running list of problems you encounter. If a problem persists and you keep running into it after a year, it's a strong signal for a potential business idea. This "aging" process filters out fleeting frustrations from genuinely persistent, valuable problems.

Contrary to the instinct to hoard proprietary information, sharing ideas openly acts as a strategic tool. As seen with Pixar and institutional funds, it attracts engaged talent and creates a public dialogue. This provides invaluable feedback that refines and improves the original concept.

To prevent the first or most senior person from anchoring a conversation, collect everyone's independent analysis in writing first. Only after this information is aggregated should the group discussion begin. This method ensures a wider range of ideas is considered and prevents premature consensus.