Create dedicated time for two distinct processes. First, an 'idea development' phase for brainstorming without judgment of budget or feasibility. Only after this phase is complete should you move to a 'refining' phase to assess practicality.

Related Insights

Entrepreneurs often have enough new ideas to kill their focus. A tactical solution is maintaining a dedicated document to fully flesh out every new idea as it arises. This process satisfies the creative urge and provides emotional distance, allowing for more objective evaluation later without disrupting current priorities.

To evaluate ideas without getting bogged down, use a simple framework: What is the idea? Why is it important? Who will it impact? Explicitly avoiding the 'how' prevents premature criticism and focuses the discussion on strategic value.

True innovation isn't about brainstorming endless ideas, but about methodically de-risking a concept in the correct order. The crucial first step is achieving problem clarity. Teams often fail by jumping to solutions before they have sufficiently reduced uncertainty about the core problem.

Teams often become 'intellectual piranhas' that critique every new idea to death, stifling innovation. To counter this, use the 'Yes, and...' improv technique from Stanford's Dan Klein. This forces participants to build upon ideas collaboratively rather than shutting them down, fostering a more creative environment.

Starting with limitations like budget and feasibility (convergent thinking) kills growth and leads to repetitive outcomes. You must begin with an expansive, divergent phase to generate a wide pool of ideas before applying any constraints.

When overwhelmed with ideas for a new project, the crucial first step is to capture, not create. Use a structured method, like a canvas, to extract chaotic thoughts from your head and turn them into a tangible, reviewable asset. This prevents paralysis and is the necessary prerequisite to building anything.

Early-stage ideas are easily killed by practical objections. To prevent this, implement a rule where feedback must begin with "Yes, and...". This forces critics to be additive and constructive, building upon the initial concept rather than immediately shutting it down. It creates space for a bold idea to develop before facing harsh reality checks.

Spend significant time debating and mapping out a project's feasibility with a trusted group before starting to build. This internal stress-test is crucial for de-risking massive undertakings by ensuring there's a clear, plausible path to the end goal.

To avoid generic brainstorming outcomes, use AI as a filter for mediocrity. Ask a tool like ChatGPT for the top 10 ideas on a topic, and then explicitly remove those common suggestions from consideration. This forces the team to bypass the obvious and engage in more original, innovative thinking.

Not all good ideas can be implemented immediately. An 'idea parking lot' (like a shared doc) serves as a repository. This makes people feel their contributions are valued, even if deferred, and creates a bank of ideas for later.