Entrepreneurs often have enough new ideas to kill their focus. A tactical solution is maintaining a dedicated document to fully flesh out every new idea as it arises. This process satisfies the creative urge and provides emotional distance, allowing for more objective evaluation later without disrupting current priorities.

True innovation isn't about brainstorming endless ideas, but about methodically de-risking a concept in the correct order. The crucial first step is achieving problem clarity. Teams often fail by jumping to solutions before they have sufficiently reduced uncertainty about the core problem.

Teams often become 'intellectual piranhas' that critique every new idea to death, stifling innovation. To counter this, use the 'Yes, and...' improv technique from Stanford's Dan Klein. This forces participants to build upon ideas collaboratively rather than shutting them down, fostering a more creative environment.

Instead of defaulting to skepticism and looking for reasons why something won't work, the most productive starting point is to imagine how big and impactful a new idea could become. After exploring the optimistic case, you can then systematically address and mitigate the risks.

Create dedicated time for two distinct processes. First, an 'idea development' phase for brainstorming without judgment of budget or feasibility. Only after this phase is complete should you move to a 'refining' phase to assess practicality.

Early-stage ideas are easily killed by practical objections. To prevent this, implement a rule where feedback must begin with "Yes, and...". This forces critics to be additive and constructive, building upon the initial concept rather than immediately shutting it down. It creates space for a bold idea to develop before facing harsh reality checks.

The common advice to ask 'why' five times can reinforce an incorrect initial framing of a problem, leading you to optimize the wrong thing. A more powerful approach is to first question the frame itself by asking, 'Is this the right thing to focus on?' before diving into causes.

Spend significant time debating and mapping out a project's feasibility with a trusted group before starting to build. This internal stress-test is crucial for de-risking massive undertakings by ensuring there's a clear, plausible path to the end goal.

When narrowing down ideas, replace generic dot-voting with prompts tied to strategic goals. Ask participants to vote based on criteria like "potential to generate X million in revenue" or "ability to increase customer retention." This ensures the winning ideas directly address core business objectives.