When your first users sign up but never return, it's a clear signal of a problem-solution mismatch. Before abandoning the idea, you must interview these users to understand why. Their feedback is crucial data needed to decide whether to iterate or pivot.

Vague "closed-lost" reasons like 'budget' or 'timing' often lead to sales blaming marketing. A "close loss audit" filters CRM data for these reasons to quantify revenue lost to the status quo, creating a shared enemy for both teams to rally against instead of fighting each other.

Focusing on successful conversions misses the much larger story. Digging into the reasons for the 85% of rejected leads uncovers systemic issues in targeting, messaging, sales process, and data hygiene, offering a far greater opportunity for funnel improvement than simply optimizing wins.

Encourage sales and BDR teams to disqualify leads and close-loss deals quickly. This 'fail fast' approach cleans the pipeline, focuses effort on viable opportunities, and provides a rapid, clear feedback loop to marketing on lead quality and campaign effectiveness.

Instead of focusing solely on conversion rates, measure 'engagement quality'—metrics that signal user confidence, like dwell time, scroll depth, and journey progression. The philosophy is that if you successfully help users understand the content and feel confident, conversions will naturally follow as a positive side effect.

Your CRM's lead rejection data is a goldmine, but only if you scrutinize it. Vague reasons like "not a fit" often conceal systemic GTM flaws. Interviewing SDRs to understand what this label actually means can reveal critical disconnects between marketing's targeting and sales's enablement.

Executive teams often create an ICP based on a 'wishlist' of big logos. The most accurate ICP is actually found by analyzing your first-party CRM data. Examining patterns across both close-won and close-lost deals reveals surprising truths about which customer segments are actually the best fit for your solution.

If a sales sprint results in confusing data and you can't figure out why some prospects are interested and others aren't, the answer isn't more calls. The next step is to go in-person and shadow a potential customer for a day. Direct, firsthand observation will reveal more ground truth than months of interviews.

Deals are lost when salespeople fail to spend enough time in discovery to understand the customer's true need. They must identify the 'moment of demand'—when the customer both recognizes their problem and is ready to decide—rather than rushing to the close with the wrong solution.