If a sales sprint results in confusing data and you can't figure out why some prospects are interested and others aren't, the answer isn't more calls. The next step is to go in-person and shadow a potential customer for a day. Direct, firsthand observation will reveal more ground truth than months of interviews.

Related Insights

The common advice to conduct unbiased discovery interviews sounds logical but often fails. The truest way to validate an idea and understand customer needs is through the act of selling. This forces a concrete value exchange and reveals genuine demand in a way that hypothetical conversations cannot.

Early on, the economic return of an individual customer is irrelevant. The real value is in deep, in-person observation. This 'goblin mode' provides rich, unfilterable signal on product usage and the customer's true project, compressing months of learning into days.

Customers, like founders, have a gap between their stated beliefs and actual behaviors. Instead of relying on discovery interviews, watch them work. Observing their actions reveals their true operating philosophy—what they genuinely value—which is a more reliable guide for product development than what they say.

Customers describe an idealized version of their world in interviews. To understand their true problems and workflows, you must be physically present. This uncovers the crucial gap between their perception and day-to-day reality.

Use a ruthlessly simple, repeatable process for zero-to-one sales: 1) Craft a 'pull hypothesis,' 2) Schedule five conversations, 3) Execute the conversations to discover demand, not to sell, and 4) Analyze the results to refine your hypothesis for the next sprint. This forces focus and rapid iteration.

To truly understand a prospect's decision-making process, ask for more than you expect to get, such as requesting to be part of their internal evaluation meeting. Even a "no" often prompts them to reveal more about their process, criteria, and stakeholders than a standard discovery question would.

Many sales calls follow a rigid framework of questions without a clear goal. This leads to confusing customer responses ("demand hairball") and a premature, ineffective product demo. The focus is on pushing supply instead of truly understanding the customer's blocked demand.

While unscalable for sales, direct one-on-one interaction with early B2C customers is an invaluable learning tool. Founders like Howard Schultz of Starbucks used this approach to observe customer friction and discover what they were truly trying to accomplish, which is essential for refining the product.

When you feel like you're trying to convince or 'push' a prospect during a sales call, treat it as a critical signal. This feeling indicates a flaw in your process—either you're targeting the wrong people or misinterpreting their demand. Use this to diagnose and fix the root cause.

Instead of pitching a customer, ask them, "Why did you decide to get on this call?" and "Why now?" This forces the prospect to articulate their own pain and why they believe you are the solution, reversing the sales dynamic and revealing core buying motivations.