The U.S. Constitution intentionally excluded women from political participation, defining power for men only. This foundational decision means the country began as what author Anna Malaika Tubbs defines as "American patriarchy," not a true democracy where power is vested in all people.

Despite women earning nearly 60% of college degrees—the primary qualification for members of Congress—they hold only 26% of seats. This statistical disparity suggests that American voters still subconsciously conflate stereotypically male traits like height and a deep voice with leadership, creating a systemic bias against female candidates.

Malala reconciled her feminist ideals with her desire for marriage by choosing a partner who shared her values. She concluded that individuals can redefine historically patriarchal institutions by creating new norms based on mutual respect and equality, rather than simply rejecting them outright.

Women are often taught that there is virtue in not taking credit and staying in the background. This social conditioning encourages self-erasure, preventing them from claiming their power and perpetuating a system where their contributions are overlooked.

Citing the Global Media Monitoring Project, data shows men are quoted as experts 75% of the time. This isn't just a fairness issue; it leads to narrower, less interesting stories by repeatedly amplifying the same perspectives and reinforcing systemic biases about who holds authority.

Despite market fears of aggressive "Abenomics 2.0," economist Ayako Fujita argues that Sanai Takaichi's fiscal plans are limited by high inflation. Her proposed policies focus on income redistribution, like tax credits for low-income households, and will take 1-2 years to implement, suggesting a more moderate approach than expected.

Societal applause for women excelling in male domains like CEO leadership, while downplaying nurturing roles, subtly implies that masculine pursuits are inherently more valuable. This reveals a form of patronizing sexism from within progressive circles.

The election of leaders like Japan's female prime minister, who enacts hardline policies, shows that voters are primarily driven by shared values, not identity characteristics. When a leader's ideology matches the electorate's, their gender or race becomes secondary.

A newsroom's "DNA"—its ingrained sense of what constitutes a front-page story—often remains male-centric even with a woman in charge. Deep-seated biases that value topics like policy over childcare persist, meaning systemic change requires more than just a change in leadership.