The lucrative maintenance and migration revenue streams for enterprise SaaS, which constitute up to 90% of software dollars, are under threat. AI agents and new systems are poised to aggressively shrink this market, severely impacting public SaaS companies' incremental revenue.
Related Insights
While AI expands software's capabilities, vendors may not capture the value. Companies could use AI to build solutions in-house more cheaply. Furthermore, traditional "per-seat" pricing models are undermined when AI reduces the number of employees required, potentially shrinking revenue even as the software delivers more value.
Traditional SaaS companies are trapped by their per-seat pricing model. Their own AI agents, if successful, would reduce the number of human seats needed, cannibalizing their core revenue. AI-native startups exploit this by using value-based pricing (e.g., tasks completed), aligning their success with customer automation goals.
Satya Nadella suggests a fundamental shift in enterprise software monetization. As autonomous AI agents become prevalent, the value unit will move from the human user ("per seat") to the AI itself. "Agents are the new seats," signaling a future where companies pay for automated tasks and outcomes, not just software access for employees.
AI is becoming the new UI, allowing users to generate bespoke interfaces for specific workflows on the fly. This fundamentally threatens the core value proposition of many SaaS companies, which is essentially selling a complex UX built on a database. The entire ecosystem will need to adapt.
AI is making core software functionality nearly free, creating an existential crisis for traditional SaaS companies. The old model of 90%+ gross margins is disappearing. The future will be dominated by a few large AI players with lower margins, alongside a strategic shift towards monetizing high-value services.
The dominant per-user-per-month SaaS business model is becoming obsolete for AI-native companies. The new standard is consumption or outcome-based pricing. Customers will pay for the specific task an AI completes or the value it generates, not for a seat license, fundamentally changing how software is sold.
The primary threat of Large Language Models to the SaaS industry isn't that they will build better software, but that they will enable the creation of 50 to 100 competitors for every existing player. This massive increase in competition will inevitably compress profit margins for everyone.
Sierra CEO Bret Taylor argues that transitioning from per-seat software licensing to value-based AI agents is a business model disruption, not just a technological one. Public companies struggle to navigate this shift as it creates a 'trough of despair' in quarterly earnings, threatening their core revenue before the new model matures.
A 'tale of two cities' exists in SaaS. Traditional software budgets are frozen, with spending eaten by price hikes from incumbents. Simultaneously, new, separate AI budgets are creating massive opportunities, making the market feel dead for classic SaaS but booming for AI-native solutions.
The push for AI-driven efficiency means many companies are past 'peak employee.' This creates a scenario analogous to a country with a declining population, where the total number of available seats is in permanent decline, making per-seat pricing a fundamentally flawed long-term business model.
