Initially, factories seemed like the easier first market for humanoids due to structured environments. However, Figure's founder now believes the home is a more near-term opportunity. The challenge of environmental variability is now seen as a data-bound problem that can be solved with large-scale data collection programs.
Related Insights
The future of humanoid robotics is not in our homes. While they will revolutionize structured B2B environments like 'dark' factories and data centers, consumer adoption will lag significantly due to a fundamental lack of desire for robots in personal, nuanced spaces.
For consumer robotics, the biggest bottleneck is real-world data. By aggressively cutting costs to make robots affordable, companies can deploy more units faster. This generates a massive data advantage, creating a feedback loop that improves the product and widens the competitive moat.
While consumer robots are flashy, the real robotics revolution will start in manufacturing. Specialized B2B robots offer immediate, massive ROI for companies that can afford them. The winner will be the company that addresses factories first and then adapts that technology for the home, not the other way around.
Companies developing humanoid robots, like One X, market a vision of autonomy but will initially ship a teleoperated product. This "human-in-the-loop" model allows them to enter the market and gather data while full autonomy is still in development.
Leading robotics companies are taking different paths to market. Boston Dynamics targets industrial use cases (e.g., DHL, BP). In contrast, both Figure AI and 1X are now focused on the home, but 1X is moving more aggressively by accepting consumer pre-orders first.
Progress in robotics for household tasks is limited by a scarcity of real-world training data, not mechanical engineering. Companies are now deploying capital-intensive "in-field" teams to collect multi-modal data from inside homes, capturing the complexity of mundane human activities to train more capable robots.
The current excitement for consumer humanoid robots mirrors the premature hype cycle of VR in the early 2010s. Robotics experts argue that practical, revenue-generating applications are not in the home but in specific industrial settings like warehouses and factories, where the technology is already commercially viable.
The AI robotics industry is entering a high-stakes period as companies move from research to reality by shipping general-purpose robots for testing in consumer homes. This marks a critical test of whether the technology is robust enough for real-world environments, with a high probability of more failures than successes.
The humanoid robot company 1X is pricing its Neo robot at $20,000 to buy or $500/month to rent. This price point is a major signal for the industry because it's already competitive with, or cheaper than, human labor for tasks like housekeeping. This makes economic viability a near-term reality, even before full autonomy is achieved.
Firms are deploying consumer robots not for immediate profit but as a data acquisition strategy. By selling hardware below cost, they collect vast amounts of real-world video and interaction data, which is the true asset used to train more advanced and capable AI models for future applications.
