Companies developing humanoid robots, like One X, market a vision of autonomy but will initially ship a teleoperated product. This "human-in-the-loop" model allows them to enter the market and gather data while full autonomy is still in development.
Related Insights
The integration of AI into human-led services will mirror Tesla's approach to self-driving. Humans will remain the primary interface (the "steering wheel"), while AI progressively automates backend tasks, enhancing capability rather than eliminating the human role entirely in the near term.
To overcome the data bottleneck in robotics, Sunday developed gloves that capture human hand movements. This allows them to train their robot's manipulation skills without needing a physical robot for teleoperation. By separating data gathering (gloves) from execution (robot), they can scale their training dataset far more efficiently than competitors who rely on robot-in-the-loop data collection methods.
The 1X robot's teleoperation, often seen as a sign of immaturity, is actually a key feature. It allows for both a "human-in-the-loop" expert service for complex tasks and personal remote control, like checking on a pet, creating immediate utility beyond full autonomy.
Instead of creating bespoke self-driving kits for every car model, a humanoid robot can physically sit in any driver's seat and operate the controls. This concept, highlighted by George Hotz, bypasses proprietary vehicle systems and hardware lock-in, treating the car as a black box.
The labor force for teleoperated robots could be sourced from the gig economy. Ride-share drivers, for instance, could operate robots during their downtime between rides, creating a flexible, scalable, and cost-effective pool of on-demand human operators.
Leading robotics companies are taking different paths to market. Boston Dynamics targets industrial use cases (e.g., DHL, BP). In contrast, both Figure AI and 1X are now focused on the home, but 1X is moving more aggressively by accepting consumer pre-orders first.
The first home humanoid robot, Nio, requires frequent human remote intervention to function. The company frames this not as a flaw but a "social contract," where early adopters pay $20,000 to actively participate in the robot's AI training. This reframes a product's limitations into a co-development feature.
While Figure's CEO criticizes competitors for using human operators in robot videos, this 'wizard of oz' technique is a critical data-gathering and development stage. Just as early Waymo cars had human operators, teleoperation is how companies collect the training data needed for true autonomy.
The evolution of Tesla's Full Self-Driving offers a clear parallel for enterprise AI adoption. Initially, human oversight and frequent "disengagements" (interventions) will be necessary. As AI agents learn, the rate of disengagement will drop, signaling a shift from a co-pilot tool to a fully autonomous worker in specific professional domains.
To achieve scalable autonomy, Flywheel AI avoids expensive, site-specific setups. Instead, they offer a valuable teleoperation service today. This service allows them to profitably collect the vast, diverse datasets required to train a generalizable autonomous system, mirroring Tesla's data collection strategy.
