Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

A marketer discovered a recurring typo ('soffware') on a six-figure trade show stand. Instead of correcting it, she ignored it for three days. No clients or executives noticed, proving that audiences often scan rather than read, making minor errors less critical than feared.

Related Insights

In the pre-AI era, a typo had limited reach. Now, a simple automation error, like a missing personalization field in an email, is replicated across thousands of potential clients simultaneously. This causes massive and immediate reputational damage that undermines any sophisticated offering.

In the old media world, the response to a gaffe was damage control and avoidance. In today's direct, high-volume media environment, the strategy has flipped. Horowitz states the answer to a mistake is not to apologize or retreat but to 'flood the zone' with a continuous stream of new content, quickly moving the conversation forward.

While delivering a virtual training, a speaker was distracted and shouted, "oh, look, a heron." While seemingly unprofessional, this human moment likely became the most memorable part of the presentation. It suggests that authenticity and relatable imperfections can create a stronger, more lasting connection with an audience than a flawless but sterile delivery.

The common instinct in a brand crisis is to repeatedly apologize. However, after acknowledging the mistake and the fix, the best path is to stop talking about it. Loyal customers want the brand to return to being trustworthy, and over-apologizing keeps the focus on the failure.

A marketer ignored a glaring typo on a six-figure exhibition stand. The decision to "bury their head in the sand" paid off, as no one from leadership or the audience noticed. This suggests for certain errors, the cost and attention of a fix can be worse than the actual mistake.

One of the most effective ways to boost online engagement is to make a deliberate, correctable error. The podcast notes that misspelling "Clawd bot" led to a flood of comments from users eager to correct them, demonstrating that the internet's need to be right is a powerful growth hack.

After establishing competence, admitting a minor flaw or making a small blunder (a "pratfall") can significantly increase appeal. This humanizes a person or product, making them seem more relatable and trustworthy. It works because it proves honesty and makes other claims more believable.

A spelling mistake of "software" on a large event stand went unnoticed by thousands. This demonstrates that in high-stimulus environments like trade shows, people's brains often auto-correct familiar words, making them blind to otherwise obvious errors that fall within their expectations.

Corporate fear of social media backlash is largely unfounded. Negative attention cycles are short, and brands can neutralize issues by quickly acknowledging them and moving on. The risk of inaction is therefore greater than the risk of making a mistake.

Don't hide from errors. Steve Munn found that when he made a mistake, taking ownership and handling it well actually enhanced client "stickiness" and deepened the relationship. Clients saw he cared and was accountable, building more trust than if the error never happened.