Filmmaker Ken Burns actively incorporates new, destabilizing information into his work, even if it makes a scene 'less good.' He believes that in historical storytelling, art must be subservient to the facts, forcing a constant reconciliation with complexity.

Related Insights

Grand visions ("poetry") are seductive but lead to disasters like the Fyre Festival if not grounded in meticulous operational details ("plumbing"). Effective leadership requires balancing the inspiring, big-picture purpose with the prosaic, detail-oriented work of execution.

Unlike engineering where 1+1 must equal 2, great stories create a whole greater than the sum of its parts. This 'third' element is the mysterious, emotional connection that changes a person's point of view in a way logical arguments cannot.

Burns counters the cliché of historical reenactors as amateurs. He views them as deeply dedicated partners who provide authentic, evocative movements, focusing on intimate details like correct underwear, which adds a layer of "God is in the details" realism to his films.

When asked about modern historical disputes like the 1619 Project vs. the 1776 Commission, Ken Burns dismisses all ideological interpretations. He insists his job is simply to "call balls and strikes"—presenting the complicated, unvarnished facts without superimposing a left or right-wing narrative.

Despite competing with short-form content like TikTok, Ken Burns' long documentaries succeed because they are built on compelling storytelling. This challenges the myth of shrinking attention spans, suggesting instead that audiences demand more engaging content, regardless of its length.

A coherent picture of a person is built from heterogeneous, often contradictory, elements. Readers find this more convincing because it mirrors real life; everyone we know is contradictory. Instead of forcing a simple narrative, revealing inconsistencies makes a character feel more authentic and human.

Burns doesn't plan his film subjects logically. Instead, he follows intuitive connections from his current project to the next, like seeing a parallel between a Vietnam battle map and the Revolutionary War, which sparked his latest film.

The brain's tendency to create stories simplifies complex information but creates a powerful confirmation bias. As illustrated by a military example where a friendly tribe was nearly bombed, leaders who get trapped in their narrative will only see evidence that confirms it, ignoring critical data to the contrary.

Ken Burns reveals that the true value of PBS is not just funding, but the luxury of time. He claims he could secure a $30 million budget from a streaming service in a single pitch meeting, but only PBS would grant him the decade required to produce a definitive work like his Vietnam series.

To create a vision that inspires belief and momentum, leaders must first be truthful about the current situation, even if it's negative. If a team senses the leader is disconnected from reality or spinning facts, they won't buy into the future vision, and momentum will stall.