Breakthrough technology companies in strategic sectors are often too risky for traditional VC but cannot sustain the debt-based instruments offered by most government programs. This creates a specific "equity valley of death" that stifles innovation in critical areas like rare earths.
Related Insights
For projects requiring hundreds of millions, fundraising should be split into phases. The initial "pre-industrialization" phase, focused on proving technology, is suited for venture capital. Later phases for manufacturing and scaling should target project finance structures with debt/equity combinations and strategic partners.
To prevent promising startups from failing from funding gaps—the "Valley of Death"—the DoD actively "crowds capital" around them. This stack includes rapid R&D contracts, manufacturing grants, and low-cost loans from a $200B lending authority.
Unlike prior tech revolutions funded mainly by equity, the AI infrastructure build-out is increasingly reliant on debt. This blurs the line between speculative growth capital (equity) and financing for predictable cash flows (debt), magnifying potential losses and increasing systemic failure risk if the AI boom falters.
Unlike the asset-light software era dominated by venture equity, the current AI and defense tech cycle is asset-heavy, requiring massive capital for hardware and infrastructure. This fundamental shift makes private credit a necessary financing tool for growth companies, forcing a mental model change away from Silicon Valley's traditional debt aversion.
In-Q-Tel, a nonprofit VC associated with the CIA, provides the early-stage equity funding that breakthrough technologies need to survive. This model successfully addresses a market failure where traditional VCs won't invest and government loans are unsuitable for tech startups.
The classic model is an entrepreneur raising equity, then seeking debt. Today, the market is flooded with capital mandated to provide debt, while equity providers are scarce. This inversion distorts economic development by prioritizing lending over genuine entrepreneurial risk-taking.
Companies pursuing revolutionary technologies like autonomous driving (Waymo) or VR (Reality Labs) must endure over a decade of massive capital burn before profitability. This affirms venture capital's core role in funding these long-term, high-risk, high-reward endeavors.
Unlike traditional capital-intensive industries, OpenAI's model is asset-light; it rents, rather than owns, its most expensive components like chips. This lack of collateral, combined with its cash-burning operations, makes traditional debt financing impossible. It is therefore forced to raise massive, dilutive equity rounds to fund its ambitious growth.
Companies tackling moonshots like autonomous vehicles (Waymo) or AGI (OpenAI) face a decade or more of massive capital burn before reaching profitability. Success depends as much on financial engineering to maintain capital flow as it does on technological breakthroughs.
For deep tech startups lacking traditional revenue metrics, the fundraising pitch should frame the market as inevitable if the technology works. This shifts the investor's bet from market validation to the team's ability to execute on a clear technical challenge, a more comfortable risk for specialized investors.
