The reshoring trend isn't about replicating traditional manufacturing. Instead, the U.S. gains a competitive advantage by leveraging automation and robotics, effectively trading labor costs for electricity costs. This strategy directly challenges global regions that rely on exporting cheap human labor.

Bringing manufacturing back to the US won't mean a return of old assembly line jobs. The real opportunity is to leapfrog to automated factories that produce sophisticated, tech-infused products. This creates a new class of higher-skill, higher-pay "blue collar plus" jobs focused on building and maintaining these advanced manufacturing systems.

Companies cannot compete on labor costs in the US. According to the Reshoring Institute, if labor constitutes more than 50% of a product's build cost, it is not a candidate for US reshoring. Success hinges on automating production to extract labor, making high-capital sectors like pharma more suitable.

Instead of trying to reclaim low-cost assembly jobs, the U.S. should leapfrog to advanced manufacturing for complex future products like robots and electric vehicles. This strategy creates a new category of higher-skill, higher-paying "blue collar plus" jobs that are more resilient to offshoring.

For the U.S. to create a resilient, regionalized supply chain ('globalization 2.0'), it cannot perform all functions itself. It must integrate with countries that can provide low-cost assembly and processing, which are uneconomical at U.S. wage levels. Colombia and Cuba are the best geographical and demographic options to fill this critical gap.

True affordability isn't just about cheap goods; it's the gap between income and expenses. Policies aimed at fixing economic inequality must focus on increasing workers' earning power (e.g., through reshoring jobs), even if it leads to higher consumer prices.

Companies offshore production because it's cheaper. Forcing manufacturing back to the US via policy results in more expensive or lower-quality goods. While it improves supply chain resilience, this should be viewed as an insurance premium—a cost, not a productive investment.

The US faces two existential threats: strategic vulnerability to China and the socio-economic collapse of its working class. This forces a difficult but necessary policy choice to bring manufacturing home, accepting higher costs to ensure national security and domestic stability.

The primary benefit of a robust domestic manufacturing base isn't just job creation. It's the innovation that arises when diverse industries physically coexist and their technologies cross-pollinate, leading to unexpected breakthroughs and real productivity gains.