Companies offshore production because it's cheaper. Forcing manufacturing back to the US via policy results in more expensive or lower-quality goods. While it improves supply chain resilience, this should be viewed as an insurance premium—a cost, not a productive investment.
Related Insights
The decline in U.S. manufacturing isn't just about labor costs. A crucial, overlooked factor is the disparity in savings. While Americans consumed, nations like China saved and invested in capital goods like factories, making their labor more productive and thus more attractive for manufacturing investment.
The move toward a less efficient, more expensive global supply chain is not a failure but a strategic correction. Over-prioritizing efficiency created a dangerous dependency on China. Diversification, while costlier in the short term, is a fundamental principle of long-term risk management.
Despite tariffs making imports more expensive, moving furniture production back to the US is seen as unrealistic. The primary obstacle is not financial, but a critical shortage of trained workers who can and want to do the work, a deficit that tariffs cannot fix.
To compete with China in manufacturing, the US can't rely on labor volume but on productivity from AI and robotics. This requires eliminating the friction of distance between R&D talent (in the Bay Area) and factory floors, making talent-proximate manufacturing parks a strategic necessity.
The biopharma outsourcing sector has proven surprisingly resilient to international tariffs. Instead of absorbing costs, well-funded European companies are bypassing tariffs altogether by investing in and building new production facilities directly on U.S. soil, effectively onshoring their manufacturing.
The U.S. focus on building domestic fabrication plants (fabs) is misguided because fabs represent a lower value-added, highly capital-intensive part of the semiconductor value chain. National security and economic strategy would be better served by focusing on downstream activities like testing and packaging, which are closer to the end consumer.
A flat tariff on imports makes complex manufacturing with numerous cross-border steps prohibitively expensive. It becomes cheaper to move domestic production steps out of the tariff zone and import the finished good only once, leading to the deindustrialization of high-skilled jobs.
The primary benefit of a robust domestic manufacturing base isn't just job creation. It's the innovation that arises when diverse industries physically coexist and their technologies cross-pollinate, leading to unexpected breakthroughs and real productivity gains.
US policy fetishizes a return to manufacturing, which employs 11% of the workforce. However, protectionist policies like tariffs actively harm the higher-margin, larger tourism industry, which employs 12%. This represents a sclerotic and irrational trade-off that damages a more valuable sector of the economy.
Globalism was highly successful, lifting millions from poverty. Its failure wasn't the concept itself, but the lack of strategic boundaries. By allowing critical supply chains (like microchips and steel) to move offshore for cost savings, nations sacrificed sovereignty and created vulnerabilities that are now causing a predictable backlash.
