People subconsciously assign others a deserved level of reputation. Exceeding this makes you "overrated" and a target. Falling below makes you "underrated," a compliment. This is a societal attempt to control confidence rather than allowing it to be self-generated.

Related Insights

When the world starts treating you in a way that doesn't align with your internal self-perception, it creates a form of "identity dysmorphia." This is especially acute for individuals from cultures that discourage ego (like Britain's "tall poppy syndrome"), making it hard to reconcile external success with a grounded sense of self.

In large, impersonal societies, it is difficult to gauge a person's character (virtue). Consequently, people seek status through easily observable metrics like wealth and achievement (success). This focus on quantifiable symbols of worth drives persistent status anxiety.

External confidence is a byproduct of an internal reputation built on integrity and consistency. It stems from keeping the private commitments you make to yourself, appreciating your discipline, and celebrating your own accomplishments. When you trust yourself, others feel it.

Don't conflate confidence with self-assurance, which is the *accurate* assessment of one's skills. Many top performers downplay their expertise out of a false sense of humility. This incongruence can be misinterpreted by others as manipulation, confusion, or a risky inability to self-assess.

The public has a "homeostatic set point" for how much success a company deserves. Being seen as "overrated" invites criticism, while being "underrated" encourages people to champion you. The goal is to be perceived as deserving of even more success.

Success can be achieved through healthy self-belief or by tearing others down out of insecurity. However, success built on the latter is unsustainable and leads to a hollow victory, defined by a lack of genuine relationships and a poorly attended funeral.

In group settings, people subconsciously assign you a "contribution score" based on the quality and relevance of your past input. Speaking too often with low-value comments lowers your score, causing others to discount your future ideas. Speaking rarely but with high insight increases it, commanding attention.

Many highly proficient individuals are driven by a deep-seated fear of being the opposite of what they project. An exceptionally beautiful person may feel ugly, a highly successful person may feel like a failure, and a very competent person may feel useless. Their public persona is a massive compensatory mechanism for this internal lack.

People get trapped by self-doubt, believing others are judging them. The reality is most people are focused on themselves. Understanding that both extreme self-confidence and crippling insecurity are internal fabrications can break the cycle of negative self-talk.

Gaining momentum through a carefully crafted persona creates a disconnect. External validation and praise never truly land because you know it's for the character, not the real you. This reinforces the core insecurity that your authentic self is not enough.

Society Imposes a "Celebration Quota" to Regulate Individual Confidence and Status | RiffOn