Regulatory capture is not an abstract problem. It has tangible negative consequences for everyday consumers, such as the elimination of free checking accounts after the Dodd-Frank Act was passed, or rules preventing physicians from opening new hospitals, which stifles competition and drives up costs.
Related Insights
A paradoxical market reality is that sectors with heavy government involvement, like healthcare and education, experience skyrocketing costs. In contrast, less-regulated, technology-driven sectors see prices consistently fall, suggesting a correlation between intervention and price inflation.
The US administration criticized Brazil's wildly successful instant-payment system, PIX, for harming companies like Visa. This stance reveals how deeply entrenched financial incumbents have captured US policy, actively resisting innovation that has made payments faster and cheaper in many other developed countries.
The immense regulatory complexity in U.S. healthcare creates an estimated $500 billion "tax" of administrative bloat. The non-obvious opportunity is that by using AI to eliminate this waste, the savings could be redirected to fund expanded patient care, rather than just being captured as profit.
Widespread cancellation of medical debt, while well-intentioned, may remove consumer pressure on providers. If patients don't need to shop around or question prices because they anticipate forgiveness, it eliminates a key market force needed to control escalating costs.
By aggregating millions of users, ZocDoc acts as a collective bargaining unit for patients. It uses its marketplace power to reward providers for patient-friendly behavior (e.g., price transparency, better hours) with better visibility, proving more effective at driving change than punitive government regulations.
The US banking system is technologically behind countries in Eastern Europe, Asia, and Latin America. This inefficiency stems from a protected regulatory environment that fosters a status quo. In contrast, markets like the UK have implemented fintech-friendly charters, enabling innovators like Revolut to thrive.
Laws like California's SB243, allowing lawsuits for "emotional harm" from chatbots, create an impossible compliance maze for startups. This fragmented regulation, while well-intentioned, benefits incumbents who can afford massive legal teams, thus stifling innovation and competition from smaller players.
The system often blamed as capitalism is distorted. True capitalism requires the risk of failure as a clearing mechanism. Today's system is closer to cronyism, where government interventions like bailouts and regulatory capture protect established players from failure.
While the Dodd-Frank Act successfully bolstered regulated banks, it pushed systemic risk into less visible parts of the financial system like crypto. The challenge has transformed from managing institutions that are 'too big to fail' to identifying risks in areas that are 'too small to see' and outside the regulatory perimeter.
Government subsidies within healthcare systems like the ACA create a perverse incentive for providers and insurers to inflate prices. This triggers a toxic flywheel: higher costs demand more subsidies, which in turn fuel further price hikes, making the underlying problem of affordability worse over time.
