By aggregating millions of users, ZocDoc acts as a collective bargaining unit for patients. It uses its marketplace power to reward providers for patient-friendly behavior (e.g., price transparency, better hours) with better visibility, proving more effective at driving change than punitive government regulations.

Related Insights

The new Medicare 'Access' code for AI in chronic care is priced too low to be profitable if humans are kept in the loop. This clever incentive design forces providers to adopt genuine AI-driven leverage rather than simply relabeling human effort, a first for healthcare technology.

By allowing insurance companies to price plans based on biometric data (blood pressure, fitness), you create powerful financial incentives for people to improve their health. This moves beyond abstract advice and makes diet and exercise a direct factor in personal finance, driving real behavioral change.

ZocDoc's defensibility isn't just technology; it's the ever-deepening operational complexity of the U.S. healthcare system. CEO Oliver Karaz likens this to mapping England's coastline—the closer you look, the more intricate it gets, creating a massive, hard-to-replicate moat built on deep domain knowledge.

Doximity's product development is 'unapologetically' focused on increasing doctor productivity and saving them time. This user-centric approach builds deep engagement and trust, creating the highly valuable physician audience that forms the foundation of its advertising-based business model.

ZocDoc's CEO argues that because multiple AI agents (from Google, OpenAI, etc.) are competing for users, they must integrate with essential real-world services like ZocDoc, DoorDash, and Uber to be useful. This gives service platforms significant negotiating power they never had in Google's search monopoly era.

The company's core value proposition stems from a non-obvious market inefficiency: doctors have roughly 30% of their schedules open due to last-minute cancellations and no-shows. ZocDoc acts as a yield management platform, filling this perishable inventory, which benefits both doctors' businesses and patients seeking quick access to care.

Despite the telehealth boom, 95% of ZocDoc's appointments for physical medicine are booked for in-person visits. The data suggests that while patients value the *option* of telehealth, they don't actually want it for somatic care, where a physical examination is crucial. The primary use case remains remote mental health services.

Dominant aggregator platforms are often misjudged as being vulnerable to technological disruption (e.g., Uber vs. robo-taxis). Their real strength lies in their network, allowing them to integrate and offer new technologies from various providers, thus becoming beneficiaries rather than victims of innovation.

Instead of simply automating jobs, ZocDoc's AI redesigns the entire patient intake process. It triages calls, routing simple queries to an AI and complex ones to the most qualified human specialist. This transforms a cost center into a highly efficient system that improves the patient experience.

The core issue preventing a patient-centric system is not a lack of technological capability but a fundamental misalignment of incentives and a deep-seated lack of trust between payers and providers. Until the data exists to change incentives, technological solutions will have limited impact.

ZocDoc Functions as a 'Patient Union' to Drive Change with Incentives, Not Punishment | RiffOn