Beyond the threat of AI, some business leaders believe Gen Z graduates are challenging to hire due to cultural issues, not automation. A perceived lack of temperament, motivation, and executive function, possibly a "COVID era phenomenon," is leading some companies to prefer hiring older, more experienced candidates instead.
Related Insights
As AI handles technical tasks, uniquely human skills like curiosity, empathy, and judgment become paramount. Leaders must adapt their hiring processes to screen for these non-replicable soft skills, which are becoming more valuable than traditional marketing competencies.
Young employees' perceived lack of resilience isn't a generational flaw but a result of parenting that shielded them from hardship. The decline of teenagers working difficult, blue-collar summer jobs has created adults who are less prepared for the realities of the workplace.
The difficulty in hiring young talent is not a temporary trend but a "new ice age." It is driven by a smaller Gen Z population compared to millennials. The problem will worsen: within a decade, more people over 65 will be leaving careers than 16-year-olds are starting them, creating a long-term demographic crisis for employers.
While AI-native, new graduates often lack the business experience and strategic context to effectively manage AI tools. Companies will instead prioritize senior leaders with high AI literacy who can achieve massive productivity gains, creating a challenging job market for recent graduates and a leaner organizational structure.
As AI handles technical tasks, the value of hard skills diminishes. The most crucial employee traits become "human" qualities: buying into the company vision, emotional intelligence, and self-awareness. These are the new competitive advantages in talent acquisition.
Tim Elmore's "Peter Pan Paradox" posits that Gen Z can seem immature (tragic) while possessing intuitive authority on culture, AI, and social media (magic). Leaders must look past their unpolished exterior to leverage these valuable, forward-looking insights that don't depend on a formal title.
Managers misinterpret Gen Z's demands for flexibility and rapid promotion as laziness. In reality, new income streams, like earning $50,000 a year from TikTok brand deals, give them unprecedented leverage and options, forcing a necessary evolution in management and retention strategies.
When building core AI technology, prioritize hiring 'AI-native' recent graduates over seasoned veterans. These individuals often possess a fearless execution mindset and a foundational understanding of new paradigms that is critical for building from the ground up, countering the traditional wisdom of hiring for experience.
Gen Z employees often possess innate authority in modern domains like AI and social media, yet they may lack basic professional maturity and emotional skills, partly due to the pandemic's impact on their development. This paradox requires leaders to coach them on fundamentals while simultaneously leveraging their unique, future-focused insights. Leaders must listen more and coach more.
Leaders complaining about Gen Z's lack of social skills are missing the point. This generation lost two critical years of in-person social development due to the pandemic. The responsibility falls on leaders to coach these skills, not punish employees for a gap the company didn't create.
