In extreme uncertainty like a fire or nuclear incident, waiting for perfect information is impossible. Effective leaders take small, iterative actions to gather data and update their strategy in real-time. This approach of 'acting your way into knowing' is more effective than trying to know everything before acting.
Related Insights
When facing ambiguity, the best strategy is not to wait for perfect information but to engage in "sense-making." This involves taking small, strategic actions, gathering data from them, and progressively building an understanding of the situation, rather than being paralyzed by analysis.
The best leaders act on incomplete information, understanding that 100% certainty is a myth that only exists in hindsight. The inability to decide amid ambiguity—choosing inaction—is a greater failure than making the wrong call.
When faced with imperfect choices, treat the decision like a standardized test question: gather the best available information and choose the option you believe is the *most* correct, even if it's not perfect. This mindset accepts ambiguity and focuses on making the best possible choice in the moment.
In fast-growing, chaotic companies, leaders often feel pressured to have all the answers. This is a trap. Your real job is not to know everything, but to be skilled at finding answers by bringing the right people together. Saying 'I don't know, let's figure it out' is a sign of strength, not weakness.
Action, even incorrect action, produces valuable information that clarifies the correct path forward. This bias toward doing over planning is a key trait of outliers. Waiting for perfect information is a silent killer of ambition, while immediate action creates momentum and reveals opportunities.
Instead of waiting for a complete picture, courageous leaders take small, experimental actions to 'sense make' their way through ambiguity. This process, observed in emergency responders, involves acting, observing cues, and rapidly iterating. It is about learning by doing, not planning everything perfectly in advance.
In a crisis, the public knows no one has all the answers. Attempting to project absolute certainty backfires. A more effective strategy is "confident humility": transparently sharing information gaps and explaining that plans will evolve as new data emerges, which builds credibility.
To prepare for low-probability, high-impact events, leaders should resist the immediate urge to create action plans. Instead, they must first creatively explore "good, bad, and ugly" scenarios without the pressure for an immediate, concrete solution. This exploration phase is crucial for resilience.
In volatile times, the instinct is to act decisively and quickly. Brené Brown argues the more effective approach is to pause, assess the situation holistically (like a soccer player controlling the ball), and then make a strategic move. This prevents reactive, scarcity-driven decisions that often backfire.
Economist Frank Knight's framework distinguishes risk (known probabilities) from uncertainty (unknowns). Today's business environment is filled with uncertainty, which triggers a natural fear and a 'freeze' response in leaders. Recognizing this distinction is the first step to acting despite incomplete information.