Policies designed to avoid economic downturns at all costs can lead to significant long-term risks. Capital and labor become trapped in inefficient companies that would otherwise fail, hindering productivity growth and creating a less dynamic economy.

For D1 Capital, the primary risk in China isn't economic but political. The government's ability to arbitrarily influence resource allocation, punish successful companies, and eliminate entire sectors without due process creates an unacceptable level of uncertainty for capital allocators, regardless of how cheap valuations become.

To counter the economic threat from China's state-directed capitalism, the U.S. is ironically being forced to adopt similar strategies. This involves greater government intervention in capital allocation and industrial policy, representing a convergence of economic models rather than a clear victory for free-market capitalism.

A surge in IPOs and M&A isn't driven by pro-business policies, but by a reduction in policy uncertainty. With a clearer, albeit more interventionist, landscape, companies have the confidence to execute major strategic plans they had previously postponed.

While politicians tout the S&P's rise, it's misleading. The US market ranks near the bottom (20th out of 21) of Western markets in recent performance. When factoring in the dollar's 10% decline against foreign currencies, the S&P has significantly underperformed its global peers in Europe and Asia.

The U.S. is shifting from industry supporter to active owner by taking direct equity stakes in firms like Intel and U.S. Steel. This move blurs the lines between free markets and state control, risking a system where political connections, not performance, determine success.

Despite favorable conditions like tax cuts and deregulation, a broad investment boom has failed to materialize outside of AI. This isn't due to tight credit, but to massive policy uncertainty from unpredictable tariffs and immigration stances, which discourages long-term capital commitment.

While investing in government-supported sectors like AI and semiconductors seems safe, it's a long-term risk. A government's priority is political—winning elections and preserving jobs—which will eventually conflict with an investor's goal of maximizing profit, leading to poor returns as seen in China.

Businesses can adapt to stable, even unfavorable, policies. However, constant, unpredictable policy changes create an environment of ambient chaos where long-term capital investment is impossible. The lack of continuity, not the specific tariffs, is the primary reason industrial construction spending has turned negative.