Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Tom cites Odoxa polling: 70% of French adults say there are too many immigrants, including 67% of Macron's own supporters. By September, 79% wanted a tougher policy and 63% backed a three-year suspension. Yet the government keeps pushing ahead, feeding Le Pen's rise.

Related Insights

Vocal support for unchecked immigration often comes from individuals shielded from its negative impacts on security, schools, and local services. Those with direct stakes—like parents and business owners—tend to hold more pragmatic views because they must confront the real-world trade-offs daily.

Even conservative governments that promise to reduce immigration often increase it once in office. They face the economic reality of needing cheap labor to keep consumer prices low, especially when dealing with currency inflation and low domestic birth rates.

Jordan Bardella's platform is an unusual mix for the populist right. It combines traditional anti-immigration and nationalist policies with a surprisingly modern, pro-business, and tech-focused discourse, including an emphasis on AI. This 'Trumpian' blend aims to broaden his appeal beyond the party's traditional base.

France's fragmented political center lacks a formal process to select a single candidate to oppose the populist right. As a result, public opinion polls are becoming the unofficial sorting mechanism. The candidate who consistently performs best in polls will likely emerge as the consensus choice, effectively making polling the primary system.

Friction around immigration stems primarily from economic anxiety rather than pure xenophobia. If the system were structured so that every immigrant measurably increased the personal wealth of existing citizens, public sentiment would likely shift to overwhelmingly favor more immigration. The core issue is perceived resource drain.

Public opposition to immigration is rooted in economic anxiety over a perceived shrinking pie. If every immigrant demonstrably increased the personal wealth of existing citizens, resistance would largely evaporate. This reveals that the core driver is economic self-interest, often mislabeled as racism.

Americans misinterpret European politics by projecting their definition of race. In Europe, 'race' is tied to nationality and culture. This leads to a centrist, deep-seated bias against all outsiders, making Europe one of the most anti-immigration places in the world, even among its political left.

The rise of the political right isn't just a marketing success; it's fueled by its willingness to address what voters see as a "legitimate grievance," particularly on immigration, which the established political class actively avoids.

In France, centrist parties are trapped. Treating the populist National Rally as a pariah has failed to stop its growth. Conversely, treating it as a respectable political opponent has also boosted its popularity, creating a strategic dead-end for the mainstream.

Despite public polling indicating a desire for less immigration, the Labour government's move to suppress it did not result in political gains. This suggests voters who prioritize the issue were not Labour supporters to begin with, and the policy failed to attract new ones.

French voters want less immigration; Macron ignores them | RiffOn