Persecution of successful minority groups often arises during economic hardship. The majority stops seeing the group's success as a result of skill or community focus and instead frames it as a zero-sum game where the minority is 'taking from us,' fueling resentment and justifying aggression.

High immigration allows politicians to report positive overall GDP growth, creating an illusion of prosperity. However, this masks the reality that per-capita GDP has been stagnant or declining, meaning the average citizen is getting poorer. It is framed as a political tool to obscure a failing economy.

Resistance to mass immigration is often mislabeled as racism when it's a defense of cultural uniqueness. The core fear is that blending all cultures creates a bland 'beige' monolith, ultimately allowing the most aggressive and cohesive incoming culture to dominate.

Friction around immigration stems primarily from economic anxiety rather than pure xenophobia. If the system were structured so that every immigrant measurably increased the personal wealth of existing citizens, public sentiment would likely shift to overwhelmingly favor more immigration. The core issue is perceived resource drain.

Despite data showing immense long-term progress, public sentiment is often negative. This disconnect arises because people judge their well-being relative to others, not to past generations. When economic gains are not broadly shared, the feeling of falling behind outweighs the reality of absolute improvement.

The public sentiment towards minority groups, particularly historical scapegoats, can function as a canary in the coal mine for a nation's economic health. When fear and economic anxiety rise, society seeks a focus for its anger, making the "temperature on the Jews" a critical, if grim, socio-economic indicator.

The root of rising civil unrest and anti-immigrant sentiment is often economic insecurity, not just a clash of cultures. People convert financial anxiety into anger, which is then easily directed at visible, culturally different groups, creating flashpoints that can escalate into violence.

Immigration policy must account for economic incentives. Unlike in the past, modern welfare states make immigration an economically rational choice for survival, not just opportunity. This shifts the dynamic, attracting individuals based on benefits rather than a desire to contribute without a safety net.

In times of economic inequality, people are psychologically driven to vote for policies that punish a perceived enemy—like the wealthy or immigrants—rather than those that directly aid the poor. This powerful emotional desire for anger and a villain fuels populist leaders.