Brand affinity cannot be accurately measured with subjective tools like consumer surveys or brand lift studies, which are often "fake reports." The only real, tangible measure of brand loyalty is objective data like repeat sales and lifetime customer value. Focus on what customers do, not what they say.
Related Insights
Brands often misinterpret repeat purchases driven by discounts or points as genuine loyalty. True loyalty is an emotional connection, not a transactional one. This "entrapment" model fails to build lasting customer relationships or brand affinity.
To accurately measure brand performance, marketers should create a composite "brand health score." This involves weighting multiple metrics—such as PR, AI visibility, traffic, and social media engagement—into a single, holistic score that provides a more comprehensive view than any individual channel metric could.
To prove brand's financial impact, connect it to the three core levers of Customer Lifetime Value (CLV). A strong brand lowers customer acquisition costs, increases retention, and supports higher margins through pricing power. Since aggregate CLV is tied to firm valuation, this makes brand's contribution tangible to a CFO.
What people claim they will do in surveys often differs dramatically from their actual purchasing behavior. This phenomenon, 'consumer dissonance,' makes survey data on price sensitivity and buying intent highly unreliable. Real-world A/B testing or sales data provides a far more accurate predictor of consumer action.
To get buy-in from financial stakeholders, translate the 'soft' concept of brand love into hard metrics. Loved brands can command higher prices, maximize customer lifetime value, and reduce customer acquisition costs through organic advocacy, proving brand is a tangible asset.
The massive gap between perceived and actual customer experience stems from flawed measurement. A CRM system can have 90% satisfaction as a reporting tool but only 10% as a sales effectiveness tool. The purpose behind the metric determines its meaning.
CLTV isn't just a metric; it's a strategic map. Understanding purchase frequencies and the entire customer lifecycle should be the foundation for creative choices, promotional timing, and messaging. Many brands neglect this, but it's the key to balancing acquisition with profitable retention.
C-suites and shareholders are increasingly focused on the long-term profitability of customer relationships. ABM programs should be measured by their ability to increase customer LTV, which reflects success in retention, cross-selling, and building "customers for life," not just closing the next deal.
Instead of chasing perfect attribution, recognize that customers will explicitly tell you how they found you. At Drift, prospects on sales calls would frequently mention being fans of their podcast. This qualitative data from the front lines is often the most direct and powerful measure of brand impact.
Instead of focusing solely on CSAT or transaction completion, a more powerful KPI for AI effectiveness is repeat usage. When customers voluntarily return to the same AI-powered channel (e.g., a chatbot) to solve a problem, it signals the experience was so effective it became their preferred method.
