Achieving a brand status that commands a premium price is not a short-term project. It demands years, often decades, of consistent messaging and marketing investment to build the necessary emotional connection with customers. Most companies lack the patience and long-term vision for this.
Related Insights
When building a brand, differentiate between long-term and short-term elements. The core purpose and emotional connection should be enduring. In contrast, functional and experiential benefits must be constantly refreshed to remain relevant as markets and consumer tastes evolve.
Before scaling paid acquisition, invest in a robust brand system. A well-defined brand DNA (art direction, voice, tone) is not a vanity project; it's the necessary infrastructure to efficiently generate the thousands of cohesive creative assets required to test and scale performance marketing campaigns successfully.
Stop viewing brand as a top-of-funnel activity. For elite companies, brand isn't a precursor to selling; it is the selling. It creates inbound demand that bypasses traditional conversion tactics like search ads or affiliate marketing, making it the most powerful and sustainable growth engine.
Pricing power allows a brand to raise prices without losing customers, effectively fighting the economic principle that demand falls as price rises. This is achieved by creating a brand perception so strong that consumers believe there is no viable substitute.
Persisting with a difficult, authentic, and more expensive production process, like using fresh ingredients instead of flavorings, is not a liability. It is the very thing that builds a long-term competitive advantage and a defensible brand story that copycats cannot easily replicate.
A business with a generic name, boring logo, and no personality is just a "company" and will always struggle to charge more. Building a memorable "brand" signals seriousness and investment, allowing you to stand out and justify a higher price point.
To get buy-in from financial stakeholders, translate the 'soft' concept of brand love into hard metrics. Loved brands can command higher prices, maximize customer lifetime value, and reduce customer acquisition costs through organic advocacy, proving brand is a tangible asset.
The common "brand vs. demand" debate is flawed. Panelists argue that consistent, long-term brand building (creating "brand gravity") is not something to balance with short-term pipeline goals, but rather the foundational investment that makes demand capture easier and more predictable.
Using Sprite as an example, Chris Burgrave shows how short-term budget cuts lead to a slow erosion of brand equity, eventual retailer delistings, and a massively expensive relaunch years later. The initial savings are dwarfed by the future investment required to regain lost ground, making consistent brand support more cost-effective.
In a crowded market, brand is defined by the product experience, not marketing campaigns. Every interaction must evoke the intended brand feeling (e.g., "lovable"). This transforms brand into a core product responsibility and creates a powerful, defensible moat that activates word-of-mouth and differentiates you from competitors.
