In a crisis, three partners had wildly different emotional reactions based on their vocabulary. One was "furious," another "pissed," but the calmest partner described himself as merely "annoyed." Deliberately choosing less intense words for negative situations can dramatically reduce their emotional impact on you.
Related Insights
Inspired by Brené Brown, partners can avoid conflict by quantifying their emotional capacity. Stating "I'm at 20%" signals you don't have the energy for a difficult conversation. This allows your partner to adjust expectations, provide support, or table the issue, preventing a fight that would have been caused by depletion, not malice.
The words you repeatedly use to describe experiences train your brain's emotional default state. If you use words like "duty," you'll condition yourself to feel burdened, whereas words like "opportunity" create a more positive baseline you unconsciously return to.
Labeling your entire job as "stressful" primes your brain to perceive even neutral events as negative. Instead, reframe it as having "stressful moments." This small linguistic shift prevents you from being on high alert all day, giving you more psychological control and reducing overall stress.
In a crisis, the instinct is to shout louder and match escalating chaos. True leadership involves 'energetic jujitsu': deliberately slowing down and bringing calmness to the situation. This rare skill is more powerful than simply increasing intensity.
The difficulty in a conversation stems less from the topic and more from your internal thoughts and feelings. Mastering conflict requires regulating your own nervous system, reframing your perspective, and clarifying your motives before trying to influence the other person.
UCLA research shows that consciously labeling a negative emotional cue (e.g., thinking “that was an eye-roll”) calms the amygdala’s threat response. This mental act restores physiological control, stopping a downward spiral in high-stakes situations like presentations or negotiations.
To move from emotional reactivity to strategic choice in conflict, use a three-step process. First, recognize your physical and emotional triggers (Self-Awareness). Next, consciously calm your nervous system (Pause). Finally, shift your view from a threat to a learning opportunity (Reframe).
The real leadership challenge isn't feeling negative emotions, but the "inflation" of those feelings into disproportionate reactions. This is caused by misinterpretations, taking things personally, or past trauma. The goal is to manage the intensity of the reaction, not the feeling itself.
A growing trend in psychology suggests relabeling emotions like anger as “unpleasant” rather than “negative.” This linguistic shift helps separate the aversive sensation from the emotion's potential long-term benefits or consequences, acknowledging that many difficult feelings have upsides.
To slow down a heated or fast-paced conversation, avoid telling the other person to calm down. Instead, validate their emotional state by acknowledging it directly, e.g., 'I hear you have a lot of passion here.' This meta-commentary creates space and can de-escalate the intensity without being confrontational.
