The most effective way to use AI is not for initial research but for synthesis. After you've gathered and vetted high-quality sources, feed them to an AI to identify common themes, find gaps, and pinpoint outliers. This dramatically speeds up analysis without sacrificing quality.
Related Insights
As platforms like AlphaSense automate the grunt work of research, the advantage is no longer in finding information. The new "alpha" for investors comes from asking better, more creative questions, identifying cross-industry trends, and being more adept at prompting the AI to uncover non-obvious connections.
The "generative" label on AI is misleading. Its true power for daily knowledge work lies not in creating artifacts, but in its superhuman ability to read, comprehend, and synthesize vast amounts of information—a far more frequent and fundamental task than writing.
After running a survey, feed the raw results file and your original list of hypotheses into an AI model. It can perform an initial pass to validate or disprove each hypothesis, providing a confidence score and flagging the most interesting findings, which massively accelerates the analysis phase.
A powerful workflow is to explicitly instruct your AI to act as a collaborative thinking partner—asking questions and organizing thoughts—while strictly forbidding it from creating final artifacts. This separates the crucial thinking phase from the generative phase, leading to better outcomes.
Treat AI as a critique partner. After synthesizing research, explain your takeaways and then ask the AI to analyze the same raw data to report on patterns, themes, or conclusions you didn't mention. This is a powerful method for revealing analytical blind spots.
To create a reliable AI persona, use a two-step process. First, use a constrained tool like Google's NotebookLM, which only uses provided source documents, to distill research into a core prompt. Then, use that fact-based prompt in a general-purpose LLM like ChatGPT to build the final interactive persona.
Advanced AI tools like "deep research" models can produce vast amounts of information, like 30-page reports, in minutes. This creates a new productivity paradox: the AI's output capacity far exceeds a human's finite ability to verify sources, apply critical thought, and transform the raw output into authentic, usable insights.
To get higher-quality input from busy medical experts, use specialized AI tools like Consensus.app to review scientific literature first. Then, present your tentative conclusions to the professional, demonstrating you've done the preliminary work, which encourages a more thoughtful and detailed response.
Don't use AI to generate generic thought leadership, which often just regurgitates existing content. The real power is using AI as a 'steroid' for your own ideas. Architect the core content yourself, then use AI to turbocharge research and data integration to make it 10x better.
The most significant recent AI advance is models' ability to use chain-of-thought reasoning, not just retrieve data. However, most business users are unaware of this 'deep research' capability and continue using AI as a simple search tool, missing its transformative potential for complex problem-solving.
