Scott Galloway launched his "resistance subscribe" campaign without coordinating with other activists because he prefers immediate action over the slow, frustrating process of group consensus. This highlights a common founder trait: a bias for action, even at the cost of initial collaboration.
In times of crisis, expecting an opposition party to lead the charge is a mistake. Real political movements are initiated by citizens who set the moral terms and take risks. The political party then becomes just one part of a larger coalition that it doesn't necessarily lead.
While public support is vital, movements don't just happen. They require specific individuals who act as catalysts. The British abolitionist movement, for example, is inseparable from Thomas Clarkson, who was the first person to envision a national public campaign and dedicate his life to it, turning a latent issue into a powerful political force.
Waiting for perfect data leads to paralysis. A core founder skill is making hard decisions with incomplete information. This 'founder gut' isn't innate; it's developed by studying the thought processes—not just the outcomes—of experienced entrepreneurs through masterminds, advisors, or podcasts.
Action, even incorrect action, produces valuable information that clarifies the correct path forward. This bias toward doing over planning is a key trait of outliers. Waiting for perfect information is a silent killer of ambition, while immediate action creates momentum and reveals opportunities.
Taking a strong stance on a strategic question, even if it's not perfectly correct, is a powerful way to accelerate progress. It provides clear direction, allowing a team to skip endless deliberation and move decisively, avoiding the paralysis that comes from trying to keep all options open.
Unlike typical consensus-driven politicians, Donald Trump is described as acting with the urgency of a startup founder, making decisions and taking action in real-time to solve problems, which accelerates policy execution.
Patreon's co-founder reflects that early-stage leadership requires gathering diverse opinions. However, as the business and founder mature, it's crucial to shift from operating by consensus to using one's own internal conviction as the North Star for decision-making.
The number one reason founders fail is not a lack of competence but a crisis of confidence that leads to hesitation. They see what needs to be done but delay, bogged down by excuses. In a fast-moving environment, a smart decision made too late is no longer a smart decision.
Successful people with unconventional paths ('dark horses') avoid rigid five or ten-year plans. Like early-stage founders, they focus on making the best immediate choice that aligns with their fulfillment, maintaining the agility to pivot. This iterative approach consistently outperforms fixed, long-term roadmaps.
The pursuit of consensus is a dangerous trap for leaders aiming for standout success. Achieving breakthroughs requires the strength to proceed based on intellectual conviction, even amidst friction and criticism. This means accepting that you cannot please everyone and that some will inevitably disagree with your path.